User talk:Wesalius

Wikidata

Hi Hypothalamus! I saw your message on Andrew-Su's page. I don't think it is a good idea to make new templates on Czech-Wikipedia. It is too much work and maintaining it will be too difficult. It would be better to use the centralized data that is gathered here: d:Wikidata:WikiProject Molecular biology and make Wikidata-Infoboxes. Because the whole world is collaborating, the chances that the data will be up-to-date is much larger. If you need any introduction to Wikidata, I can help you. --Tobias1984 (talk) 21:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! I would really appreciate the offered introduction to Wikidata. I have no idea from where to start, so if you can help me on my route to nice up-to-date infoboxes on our protein articles, then I (and Czech wiki community) would be very grateful. What would be the next step for me? Hypothalamus (talk) 22:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would propose that you and all the other people interested join the project d:Wikidata:WikiProject Molecular biology and we can talk on the project page over there. We can then find a test article and try to implement the Wikidata information. --Tobias1984 (talk) 22:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account

I just wanted to let you know that it has been blocked for running an unapproved bot. All bots must be approved at Wikipedia's bot approval group. Additionally, using a bot for the simple purpose of reaching 500 edits is not allowed and will generally not be approved. If you have questions, please let me know. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I dont intend to run a bot on en.wiki, so I why would I ask for an approval. I was edditing only my user page subpage, no vandalism anywhere. If I would edit my userpage manually 350 times, would you block me as well? If yes, what would be the reason? If not, why would you block me doing the very same thing through a python script with the intetion to get right to contribute using WP:CXT? --Wesalius (talk) 20:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The bot was only editing in the userspace, which is permissible without prior approval, so I have unblocked your account. However I agree this isn't the best way to get extendend confirmed... I see you're trying to help out with translations, and your SUL looks good, so I'm going manually assign you extended confirmed rights. This will allow you to use the content translation tool. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you for your understanding — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with everybody here this was not a good way, but it was the only way since that RfC about abusefilter for CXT is already closed to comments. I had a summary which clearly stated that it was a robot edit, so no rogue intentions there. Sorry for cluttering up RC, I did not intend to make patrol work any harder for anyone, but no one suggested any other way to do this without stupid workarounds such as pseudodrafting the article, so I went for this dirty solution. --Wesalius (talk) 20:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ATR42/72 operators

Dear Wesalius, I kindly request you that before adding a civil operator to the list, you read the requirements of the list stated in the article (just above the list, at the begining of the section). These requirements says 10 or more units for ATR42 and 15 or more units for ATR72. I know all of us may want to highlight our country's airline/s, but if we do that, we would flood the article with a lot of operators that will result in irrelevant information for the article. Bear in mind that Czech Airlines only has 3 ATR42 and 4 ATR72 and that there are much more airlines with more units that have been omited.

I hope you can understand it, and that next time you read the requirements before adding companies' name to an article.

Best regards, --Infiltrado6 (talk) 23:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I just havent read the requirements. No intention of promoting my home country airlines, I just knew that they operate them so thats why I added them. Cheers. --Wesalius (talk) 23:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know you hadn't have bad intentions or intentions on promoting your country airlines, but I understand that we all ususally write about our home country because is something we know better. Thank you and kind regards =) --Infiltrado6 (talk) 23:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wesalius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wesalius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Wesalius/model

User:Wesalius/model, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wesalius/model and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wesalius/model during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GTrang (talk) 14:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]