User talk:Wernergerman

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Wernergerman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Erwin Rommel. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RP459 (talk) 22:53, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Empty Buffer (talk) 14:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wernergerman. Additional text Ian.thomson (talk) 15:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Genghis Khan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Homework2 ^Talk What I do! 16:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Genghis Khan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 16:53, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 2 weeks, for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 17:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wernergerman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

forgot my old password for the username wernergerman so i signed up for a new one germanican , i discovered what it was eventually and so i proceeded to utilize the old account once again ... i haven't used either of them for the purpose of manipulating my posts and edits , however i realize now that my judgement was ultimately flawed and will not double my account status in the future ... please remove this block Wernergerman (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You edited with Germanican on June 3 and with this account on June 4, so presumably you have recovered your password then. If what you say is true, why are you using the Germanican account today (June 7)? Tim Song (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wernergerman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i created the germanican account due having forgot the password for wernergerman , since then i have employed the older account for the most part , however there was no intention on my part to take advantage of this double account feature for inappropriate conduct ... i even admitted that i was both wernergerman and germanican explicitly when asked ... on two accounts.

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Genghis_Khan#apparently_khan_was_a_nordic_to_loved_to_enslave_caucasians_to_serve_the_asians_both_sexually_and_in_manual_labor_-_he_established_the_largest_system_of_.22_white_.22_slavery_the_world_has_ever_known.

despite the fact that i admitted being both germanican and wernergerman the username ian.thompson had filed charges against me of being guilty of sockpuppeting ... he obviously had bad intentions and i hope that he's reprimanded for this

however , i realize now that my judgement in creating another account was ultimately flawed and will not double my account in the future. please unblock my account.

Decline reason:

The block was issued for socking, but your contributions at Talk:Genghis Khan seem eccentric and argumentative, e.g. [1]. You were a participant in an edit war at Genghis Khan that led to the article being full protected. Your comment above that Ian.thomson had bad intentions for reporting you for socking seems absurd. I see no promise here to change your future behavior, so I don't see a reason to lift the block. EdJohnston (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please read WP:SOCK and make sure you fully understand it (and where you went wrong), then I or another admin will consider your request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the article and have come to an understanding of it. Wernergerman (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Suggestion

You can use the "show preview" button, or create a new page on your talk page at, say, User_talk:Wernergerman/Sandbox to preview your posts rather than make six or seven edits that fill up the talk history and make it hard to tell when you're done. It's generally considered poor form to edit one's own talk page posts after they've been posted, and I know you are merely clarifying your statement on the fly, but it would be better to do without even the appearance of rewriting past posts. siafu (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]