User talk:Werewaz

Naming conventions in PRC and ROC

Please read WP:Naming_conventions_(Chinese)#Political_NPOV. If you continue after this to rename the two states Republic of China as Taiwan, and People's Republic of China as China in articles, I will start to issue warnings for POV vandalism. You have been asked several times to consider naming conventions.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 08:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop and discuss

Please stop your mass renaming of Taiwan/China related terms. This is a contentious field and has had extensive discussion before. It's safe to assume that any particular instance that has been unchanged for some time has community consensus. If you want to change the consensus, discuss. Don't run all over the place making contentious changes. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Basket of Puppies 14:18, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to List of Asian and Pacific countries by GDP (nominal), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Go see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#ROC.2FChina.2FTaiwan_conflict now. VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 15:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to List of countries by future GDP (nominal) estimates, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I never understand why people think getting blocked on wikipedia is some kind of personal achievement. VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 17:30, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rayesworied for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 21:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]