User talk:Wellingtoncat

Today is Friday, November 15, 2024, 12:42 (UTC/GMT).
There are 6,910,890 articles on the English Wikipedia.

The world is STILL waiting to be made anew (I mean out of cheese)..... :(

Wellingtoncat	Awards	Userboxes	Talk

WELCOME ONE, WELCOME ALL

Leave a message at the end of my dribble! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.102.172.87 (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Der Content Mein Leige (or something equally gibber-esque)

Welcome!

Hello, Wellingtoncat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Having prowled around houses in North Hobart, Sandy Bay in a previous lifetime - I was astonished to see no one has welcomed you! Enjoy it all! (One of the more unusual experiences of mine very many moons ago was listening to a waso violinist play danny boy while a local sang to it - in one of the now decommisioned Queenstown, Tasmania hotels.) Sigh SatuSuro 12:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks SatuSuro!!! I really love the philosophy of Wikipedia, and I'm really pleased that it seems to attract some great people to it! Thanks for your welcome and advice!! (Wellingtoncat 21:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Glad you like it - never let the grumps, bears or tigers get to you - there's enough of other types around to make it a good experience. SatuSuro 05:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the prowl

Growl - some your arts need more than what they are - they need refs - growl (tabby territory issues there) - and third party refs to survive tagging - needs some work to save then the tagging - websites, articles, books, - find em ref em and fix em - growl (smile) - in other words cheshire cat here - confused? find a ref Satu Suro 02:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big problem is if they are not to hand (refs) - it might not be possible - like a walk to the state ref in hobart. To technically avoid the larger growlers in the upper reaches of the food chain of the great goldfishbowl of wikipedia :) one must have a category, a project tag and a few refs to keep them from licking their lips and scratching (muffled growlpurr and sudden twist of the tail) Satu Suro 07:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

screeching scrowl howl across the nullarbor and ringing through the double glassed canberra windoze - a possible solution to the articles with lack of something or others - an example - scrowl scratch scramble etc etc to the tune of we'll all got together when we go .. etc http://protocat.nla.gov.au/Search/Home?lookfor=don+kay&type=all&filter%5B%5D=&submit=Find - just imagine its in canberra and its called protocat - meeewous? Satu Suro 12:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

an deres toomuch white space inda Constantine Koukias articel - the awards/comps could be compressed somewhat for its own sake so to speak Satu Suro 12:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something...

^La Pianísta! has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Why? Just because. :) --^La Pianísta! 18:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

WP:CTM election notice

WikiProject Contemporary music

Hi and hello! We are currently electing our first coordinator, see Election: Coordinator for 2010. If you are interested in being a candidate, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. Nominations are open until Sunday 3 January. You can see more information about this at Wikipedia:WikiProject Contemporary music/Coordinator.

P.S. You are currently listed on the project participants list. Are you still active on the project? If so, please reconfirm your name on the Members list. Thanks and good editing!

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Wellingtoncat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 211 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Robert Jarman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see...

... Talk:IHOS Music Theatre and Opera, Talk:Hobart Chamber Orchestra, and Talk:The Priest's Passion concerning text which was removed as copyright violation from these articles. You might want to check other articles to which you have made contributions to see if any such text remains in them. Also, you need to provide references demonstrating the notability of some of the people and works you have written about. Some like Hobart Chamber Orchestra are completely unreferenced. The others have only primary sources as references. Some of them are at serious risk of deletion if references cannot be provided showing significant coverage of them in reliable published sources which are independent of the subject, especially Nicholas Dewey and The Priest's Passion. Nicholas Dewey is especially serious because you have added personal information about a living person which has no supporting references at at all.Voceditenore (talk) 13:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See also Robert Jarman, which has no independent sources at all, especially considering that it makes claims like: "...he quickly established himself as one the leading entities within the Tasmanian arts industry". Voceditenore (talk) 13:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are also problems with Tasmanian Composers Collective. See Talk:Tasmanian Composers Collective for details. Voceditenore (talk) 16:52, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Nicholas Dewey: It seems that this too is a verbatim paste from a copyright website: http://www.freewebs.com/daylightrobbery/aboutus.htm. See the talk page for links to guidance on this issue. You really must make sure you do not copy and paste any more material from other websites into Wikipedia. Voceditenore (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Classical music edit-a-thon

Hi Wellingtoncat, a few of us are organising a classical music edit-a-thon between 8-14 October with the theme Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown. There will also be a meetup in Sydney, so we are using Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012 as our main discussion page. A lot of the hard work will be done online, somehow. I hope you'll join us. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 01:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Wellingtoncat! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Wellingtoncat! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 22:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Dewey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicholas Dewey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —teb728 t c 05:00, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Classical Music, Composition Task Force Revival

Hello, I'm Tal Brenev. I've recently left a message at Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Classical music/Compositions task force, in an attempt to revive the WikiProject. I will try to send a message to everyone on the list of participants, so as to get more suggestions and/or ideas. If you would like to participate, leave a message at the WikiProject Talk Page, or on my talk page. Thanks!

---Tal Brenev (talk) 22:23, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Nomination of The Priest's Passion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Priest's Passion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Priest's Passion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]