Jump to content

User talk:Wellington Victory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afro code (March 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wellington Victory! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afro code (March 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Afro code, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a reason why this should be deleted, wikipedia is not a dictionary for only commonly used words.
My effort is just to make the company present on the web, just like Google and other companies
If it was for advertisement, it won't be as a page, whereby to get to the page, users have to already know the company to search for it.
If this page is not good enough for an encyclopedia, then why is there a page for Google.
If I'm wrong, please tell me what makes it not good enough Wellington Victory (talk) 09:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]