User talk:Welkinstan

December 2020

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:El C ‎. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. bonadea contributions talk 18:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think you know the meaning of the word attack. After investigating the claims of the editor, I found that they lied, and appear to have a deeply unhealthy fixation with Matthew Berdyck. I truly feel they need mental health help. I say this with 100% sincerity and it is not an attack. Please stop threatening me for stating facts. You can ban me but I'll be back and I will bring this matter to the whole community. It's clear that Wikipedia is waging a war against Matthew Berdyck and has been for almost 7 years, as the history is overwhelming and apparent. One editor said, 7 years ago, "The name Matthew Berdyck will NEVER appear on Wikiepdia. I will make that my life's goal." This is completely unhealthy. This editor has volumes of person and disturbing attacks against Berdyck and even edited the article to remove half of the facts about the scandal just to ersse Matthew's name.

You do not have the right to rewrite history just because there is a conspiracy to suppress and censor Matthew Berdycdk, which at this point, is not exactly a national secret.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Welkinstan. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Doubling down on the attack as a response to a formal warning is not the best strategy. This is not a "threat", it is information about what will happen if you call other editors "liars" and make allegations about their mental health. bonadea contributions talk 19:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Not to be overly harsh, Welkinstan, but you are coming across as incredibly self-absorbed. Do you know how many users I have blocked from Wikipedia, overall? Thousands and thousands of em. Somehow, you expect me to immediately recollect what is, to me, a block which pertains to some random non-notable activist...? What I find curious is that you even bothered with that atrociously-spelled attack. How does that advance your interests in any way? As opposed to politely saying something to the effect of: 'I think Matthew Berdyck has now become (or has always been) notable — how do I submit a proposal to allow for having a Wikipedia article about him?' But no, you go with a rant which is almost-comically "aggressive." Which, I'm sorry to say, reflects poorly on your faculties, as far as composure and reasoning go... El_C 21:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]