User talk:WeirdPsycopath

May 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Llena de amor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Llena de amor was changed by WeirdPsycopath (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906715 on 2014-05-15T23:57:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cuidado con el ángel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cuidado con el ángel was changed by WeirdPsycopath (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860968 on 2014-05-16T00:38:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WeirdPsycopath, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi WeirdPsycopath! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Levy (actor), you may be blocked from editing. Vieque (talk • ctb) 20:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eduardo Santamarina. TheCascadian 22:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Girl has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Girl was changed by WeirdPsycopath (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855851 on 2014-05-21T00:36:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:36, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cynthia Klitbo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fabiola Guajardo

The article Fabiola Guajardo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Scarlettail (talk) 16:38, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De que te quiero, te quiero

Hello, you're adding information has references and wikipedia is not a primary source, it is also irrelevant information, this is not a blog wikipedia telenovela. His editions were also harmful. And it has decided to remove all kinds of information that contains references or not is irrelevant.--Damián80 (talk) 18:22, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Damián80 with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You need to change your tone and tact immediately. The next time you call someone an idiot, jerk or other equally rude name, you will be blocked from editing, and likely for an indefinite period of time. If you can't control your temper and act like an adult, then you need to get another hobby. Simply put, we don't have the time and patience to tolerate someone who spends half their time insulting others. There is no excuse, ever, for the way you have treated others. I hope this is perfectly clear and you won't be warned further, you will just be blocked. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 10:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to De que te quiero, te quiero with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 16:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De que te quiero, te quiero

Hello, please I ask you to stop the edit wars, and it was enough. The crosses are not used on the characters, not because the actors have died in real vidda and independently as you see it is wrong to add them. Table of hearings per day was canceled for violating the polítcias what wikipedia is not fouled and references.--Damián (talk) 22:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you put this in spanish? I understood nothing, sorry.

Ok, le repito, el ponerle cruces a los personajes es innecesario y además es algo que se lleva evitando desde hace un año, pues los actores no han muerto y no tiene nada que ver que se coloque junto a los personajes o a los actores es irrelevante, si alguien quiere saber que personaje murió en la telenovela pues que la vea, que para eso fue creada. Por otra parte la tabla de la sección del elenco estaba muy bien colocada, gracias a que una ip se tomo el tiempo de arreglarla. La sección de "Mexico broadcast" es irrelevante porque no tiene referencias e incumple con Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, la información fue retirada de varios artículos por lo mismo.--Damián (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:00, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. the panda ₯’ 23:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to suggest this, but if you cannot understand core policies like WP:CONSENSUS and WP:EW because of linguistic reasons, it's quite possible that the English version of Wikipedia is not your forté. Note: this block applies to YOU the person - do not create new accounts, and do not make any Wikipedia edits until this block is done the panda ₯’ 23:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Above, you asked Damián to reply in Español, showing that you really need to edit at http://es.wikipedia.org and not here. La mayoría de las personas no hablan español aquí, por lo que sólo se encuentran problemas en la Wikipedia en Inglés para usted. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeirdPsycopath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because I didn't know the policies for Wikipedia. Also I do speak english, I asked Damian80 to translate because I can't understand his english, it's bad (not trying to be mean). I hope you can unblock me. I really like editing Wikipedia & #126;OhNoitsJamie ^Talk

Decline reason:

If you don't understand our policies, don't speak English well, and share this account, then Wikipedia is not for you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When you signed up, you agreed to the policies. They're also listed all over this talkpage. Would you care to explain in your own words about consensus and edit-warring, based on the policies you say you understand? Then explain how your edits violated, and what you'll do differently - just like it says to do in wp:GAB the panda ₯’ 00:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one that signed up, it was my friend. He gave me this account.

I have just extended the block to indefinite, as per your admission, it has been compromised the panda ₯’ 00:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why? You're not unocking me? Damian80 should be blocked to for sockpuppetry, he did it as "Chema".

Sorry to put me here, but I do not understand is that the inclusion of my other account here?, That account was blocked, yes, because he had not declared as mine, but this issue was solved with another administrator. So I do not understand this next comment.--Damián (talk) 02:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't quite find the essay I thought described how the editor is acting, but basically, it looks like they are trying to get people to look at you instead of them. In essay form (as best I can), a little WP:BOOMERANG, a little WP:KETTLE (a lot WP:KETTLE?), maybe a little WP:PRAM? WeirdPsycopath seems to be trying to shift the "block spotlight" from their actions to yours. - Purplewowies (talk) 05:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're looking for WP:NOTTHEM? the panda ₯’ 08:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that. Sigh, it seems so obvious now. I need to stop doing/looking at policy-related things past my bedtime.

- Purplewowies (talk) 14:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, Damian80. You are seriously accusing me of sockpuppetry, without me doing it. I was asking Mario if you were reverting his edits to cause he also claimed they were revelant, like im doing. So before you keep up with your hypocritical comments, just be quiet.

Um, you accused Damian of sockpuppetry, not the other way around. He merely responded. Please recognize that the only reason you still have access to this talkpage is related to potential unblocks - attacking others is not acceptable the panda ₯’ 22:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the user may be referring to a recent ANI thread that mentions him in discussion of Mario. - Purplewowies (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that as well, and found it interesting enough to look around, and did one of these [[1]], which is unusual for someone with 100 edits. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 01:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Mario you could search all you want you aint finding anything. I'm suprised Damian80 is helping, what a hypocrite. until when am I blocked by the way.

You're blocked indefinitely. 129.78.68.1 (talk) 05:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Your block is set as indefinite, which means you are blocked for the foreseeable future. In this context, that's probably until either a successful unblock request (i.e. one that acknowledges specifically what you did wrong and provides a good faith declaration that you will genuinely try not to do it again) or a removal of your ability to use your talk page, which more or less will result in the block continuing forever (which is likely if you keep up the incivility). Do note that if you are Mario—I'm assuming nothing either way—other users will likely figure it out, whether by the duck test or with something more technological like CheckUser. - Purplewowies (talk) 05:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

all of you guys have pushed me way too far I am NOT Mario I do not have a sock puppet account and I don't give a f*** what you think, you can do your little stupid duck test, you can also block me forever I honestly don't care, all of you to go to hell, specially Damian80. Also keep up with the bad work Damian80. Have a nice day ~ WeirdPsycopath

Please stop. With this uncivil behavior, you are extremely likely to have your talk page editing privelege removed. That privilege was supposed to be there to allow you to advocate for an unblock, not for you to continually make uncivil comments. Nobody has commented to say that you are definitely Mario, people are simply noticing similarities (and yes, this is a facet of the duck test). My comment was simply to inform you that the site does have multiple ways to figure it out, if it is happening. - Purplewowies (talk) 14:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Fernandez Rue

The article Ricardo Fernandez Rue has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]