User talk:Webdinger/Archive2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Webdinger. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
user_talk:
webdinger
Highlights from this archive!
- SamWolken
- "Thank you, Webdinger, for your exceptional contributions to Colorado-related articles."
- EnsRedShirt
- "Thanks for the rewrite, and reformat ... Plus all the other work you have done on the Platte Canyon High School shooting article."
This is Archive 2, containing material from:
- May 28, 2006 (Elizabeth Hess) to
- September 28, 2006 (Platte Canyon High School shooting).
Elizabeth Hess
Before doing the redirect you should have checked to see if any articles would be inappropriately redirected to your redirection. Is the actress Elizabeth Hess the same Elizabeth Hess that won the spelling bee? If not, then people would be mighty confused to click on her name in the page for, say, Clarissa Explains It All and then have it redirect to the spelling bee page. Some brief investigation on your part would have spared this type of confusion. I will add a stub for Hess under her name. Please do try to be more careful in the future. Pacian 04:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- I was unaware that such a person existed under an important role in a television series. I'll add a disambiguation notice and will try to look more closely in the future. — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 19:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Scripps National Spelling Bee
Great work on the article! The article has really come into its own, and just in time for the 2006 Bee which will no doubt increase its publicity and exposure. Vernon 02:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, Vernon! You did a fantastic job working on it too — I hope our hard work pays off this week. — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 19:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
User page
Hey, Carabinieri! Mind if I take the initiative and overhaul your page for you? ;):
- Yeah, go ahead.--CarabinieriTTaallkk 14:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- That looks great. I'll just copy it onto my user page if that's ok for you.--CarabinieriTTaallkk 11:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Webdinger! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 15:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry
On the Tenzin Gyatso page, your last edit according to my (faulty) bowser was just adding "ISBN", however I now realise there is a possibility you fully restored the entire references and I couldn't see that because of Bug5643. If so, I am really sorry. 80.189.239.135 22:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nothing to worry about; I think you're right about the bug. I myself use Firefox (although this hasn't ever happened to me), and what emerged from your edit is an incomplete template and a nonexistent ISBN code. I tried to fix the template, but unfortunately, I didn't know the ISBN code. Could you re-edit the article and insert the ISBN code, if you know it? Thank you very much for your help! — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 23:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- I found an earlier version of the page that contained the remainder of the references and external links section. The article is, thankfully, back to normal now! — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 23:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks again. 80.189.78.216 18:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
August Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
I award you this Barnstar!
Minor Barnstar
The Minor Barnstar
Thank you Webdinger for your exceptional contributions in Colorado related articles. SamWolken 00:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
- I just realized I hadn't taken the opportunity to thank you yet! Thanks, SamWolken, for my first barnstar. — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 21:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Greetings
Hi, I'm Quadell. It's good to see young people who are really into Wikipedia -- not just the community, but the building of an encyclopedia. Your user page looks great, by the way! I've never run into a last name of So before. At first I thought it was Asian, but you know Spanish and want to go to Israel someday, so now I'm all confused. What is your ethnicity? All the best, – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 01:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- (Replied to Quadell via e-mail.) — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 02:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
By the way: you mentioned that you sometimes translate pages from Spanish into English. I'd like to direct you attention to es:Trillo (agricultura), which is a featured article on the Spanish Wikipedia, and it's equivalent English article, Threshing-board, a stub. Could you incorporate the information from the Spanish page into the English one? Thanks, – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 17:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Quadell, sure. It might take a while though, due to the length of the article ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 00:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Colorado template
Hey, Lovelac7, I appreciate your efforts to standardize all the state templates and I commend you for doing a good job. I have a concern about the text sizes — I think that it'd be best if it was at least 11px in size, merely for aesthetics and readability. I am particularly concerned about the Colorado template, because up until the point that you edited it the font size had been 11px. Can this be done for all of the state templates? I wanted to consult you first, since you have been bold and taken the initiative to do something that has been in the backburner for a while. I tried to standardize the Colorado template myself for a little while — you'll see my efforts in the template's history along with its talk page. Great job! Thanks, and all the best, — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 03:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Webdinger,
- Feel free to fix anything about Colorado or any other state templates. I mainly wanted to take a stab at making them all the same size and layout. (i.e. 94% page width, with section headers on the left.) Anyway, I'm glad you approve of me being bold, and I encourage you to do the same.
- Thanks; I'll work on making the templates look better, along with their readability. ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 16:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Good job on the Colorado template. I noticed that some editors have complained about me centering the links. I really don't care which alignment the links have. I just wanted to be consistant, so I chose one style and stuck with it. Like I said, feel free to rearrange my work. Lovelac7 23:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Lovelac7, thanks; I'm sure several editors are angry with the prospect of standardization (specifically for Template:Delaware). I myself was very attached to Template:Colorado and was surprised to see it changed before realizing what a good thing you've done. I've been posting sections on each state template's discussion page with a link to the WikiProject U.S. states talk page for a possible consensus on alignment and other standardization issues. Feel free to change anything I've done! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 23:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Delaware template
Hello Webdinger, I have been studying the changes made by Lovelac and you to the Delaware template, and appreciate the effort to reach common ground. I am OK with the content and its layout, especially since you changed the font. So all my issues are cosmetic. Frankly, I think my design looks far better than what you have come up with, but I know you are trying to fit this round peg into the square hole of what most of the templates look like now, flag in upper left, labels lower left, title on top. I wish you could cut away from that and design something new, but know how hard that would be. A couple of things still need to happen at a minimum. The only reason I had the flag on the right and no label on the left was to get the words centered. If you must have the label on the left, the flag on the right has to be all the way to the right, or entirely gone (either is OK) and the wording all centered under the title, wherever that is. If you can accomplish that, I think the design will be workable. Thanks again for the effort. stilltim 00:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Stilltim: I appreciate your attachment to Template:Delaware and your desire to keep it the way that it is now (it looked great before, and it still does!). I was the same way with Template:Colorado before I realized that some state templates are so inconsistent with each other that something had to be done. I personally don't mind if the Delaware template remains as it is; it merely presents the links in a much more concise way than what Lovelac7 and I have been trying out on the other state templates.
- Regarding the location of the flag images, that's something that several templates had previously, an image of the flag on the left and an image of the state seal on the right. I love the work that you've done on Template:Delaware; it's a fantastic template that will be easy to maintain and the colors juxtapose each other well. I'm all for keeping it the way it is. Feel free to tell us how to standardize the rest of the state templates (and how they can complement Delaware's) over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. Thanks for your concern! ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 01:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am now pretty much OK with the template, except for three small things, 1) the content needs to be centered in the box, under the title, not centered in the white space, 2) the content does not need to be bold, I turned it on, but cannot turn it off, and 3) the colors would look better if they filled out to the inside margin line. I have no idea how to do any of these things, do you? would you? I would be grateful. stilltim 02:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Stilltim, I got it fixed as much as I could without compromising the look of the template. Here's what I've achieved:
- The content is now centered to the title and not the entire area of space; I added in a 75px margin to the right of the content.
- I removed the bold-facing on "Topics." Is that what you wanted or is it the title that you wanted me to remove the bold-facing?
- I removed the margins as much as I could, but there is still a 2px margin that refuses to disappear. I'll try again tomorrow.
- Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you! ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 03:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Stilltim, I got it fixed as much as I could without compromising the look of the template. Here's what I've achieved:
Your latest mods for centering and bold face are perfect- thank-you. The only thing missing is a double line I had around the margin- see the code written in J. Caleb Boggs for the US Congress box- and the older version of the box. These lines give the box a more finished look and somehow also forces a little spacing that positions the template perfectly after the article text. Your help is most appreciated, as I can write history, but am not much good at programming. stilltim 10:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, Stilltim, I'm finished with your requests; what a difficult template to work with! It looks almost exactly like the United States Congress template you have on the J. Caleb Boggs page as for spacing and borders. And thankfully, it looks passable in Internet Explorer. Please, if there is anything more you would like me to do, feel absolutely free to contact me again on my talk page. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 00:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Woohoo! Eighth!
I hereby give you the "Eighth Person to Have Visted My Page" Award. Congrats! I'd just like to know how you found my page. Cheers! ←T•h•e R.S.J.→ 22:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I get bored very easily on Wikipedia (even though there's plenty to do), so I decided to go into my talk page, pick a user page, then go to their talk page and follow a link to another user page, where the process would be repeated. I don't really remember what user's talk page I used to get to your page, but hey, at least I found it! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 00:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Okay, thanks! ←T•h•e R.S.J.→ 20:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey, Ravedave, you stated on the edit summary of your recent edits to Template:Minnesota that "if standard == ugly then lets go nonstandard." What do you mean, ugly? As far as I can tell, the editors who are participating in the standardization effort are focusing on both clarity and how the template looks. Do you have a problem with the font size or the background color alternating? I see few differences between the current version of Template:Minnesota and other templates such as Template:Colorado (which was one of the very first templates to be standardized). Please offer your thoughts on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates regarding what you'd like changed. Thanks! ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Dave, Hi this is Lovelac7, the last one who madea a change to the Minnesota template. Since the biggest thing I changed was the color, I'm going to combine my changes with the old color. Tell me what you think of this version. If you don't like it, please let me know what you dislike in particular. Thanks for your input. Lovelac7 02:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry I should have been more specific, it was only the color that bothered me. The all dark blue made the flag dissapear. I should have been more clear about what I didn't like. Your efforts in standardization are appreciated. -Ravedave (help name my baby) 03:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, that's fine! Thanks for clarifying, though! (And sorry for the late reply) ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 00:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Smile
The RSJ - SPEAK has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
I'm giving these messages to everyone I know, and it's not the wrong kind of WikiLove (lol)... Cheers!
- Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 01:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for joining WikiProject Redirect!
Auroranorth. You are in the process of being considered for the role of Vice-Chairman of the Committee.
September Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
/div
Sorry, but I think a mistake has been made. I added a div to this page because, as I was looking at your page (which I love by the way) I noticed that on this page, everything following the intro section is squished over to the right half of the screen, in line with the right column. I added what I thought was a missing div to allow the content to go accross the entire page like the rest of your pages. Sorry for the confusion. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 12:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
On another note, I've noticed that, even though I've changed my username (and my sig) people still find my old username talk page. I'm just wondering what I've missed that people use to get there? - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 22:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification, Trevor; I appreciate it. However, I wasn't aware that the content spread across the entire page. Is this a browser-related issue? And as for your old username talk page, I have no idea. I clicked on the link to your talk page via the history page for my talk page, but I don't think that played a significant factor. Maybe it's just one of those mysterious errors. Cheers! ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 20:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey, how's it goin'? Thanks for the help with the temp. I'm Editor19841 from Denver by the way. You've got a cool user page, and it looks like your not into userboxes, but if your interested you should check out {{User WPColorado}}, {{User Coloradan}} or {{User Colorado}}. Anyhow, have a good one, see you around. Editor19841 (talk) 20:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hiya, Editor19841. You're very welcome for the template help! And I do have userboxes—I guess they're pretty difficult to find—at User:Webdinger/Userboxes. You have a wonderful userpage also, by the way; it's one of the most informative userpages I've ever seen. Thanks for all your wonderful help in WikiProject Colorado; keep it coming! ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 23:36, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Isn't mirage 50-50 ally and villain. what should it be--Ageo020 (talk • contribs • count) 21:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- I guess it is half and half. I think more people perhaps will have more of a formulated opinion that Mirage is a villain. I'd say it's up to the person who is interpreting the template, but I personally don't mind which section it's in—I created it after responding to a request to the request for templates page. ;) — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 23:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
Thanks for the rewrite, and reformat.. Plus all the other work you have done on the Platte Canyon High School shooting article. EnsRedShirt 08:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC) |