User talk:Webdesignsbynat

This is Webdesignsbynat's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doug Hiser (July 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please see WP:NOTRESUME and WP:NOTLIST. Also, Amazon or commercial sites in general are not reliable sources. In order for something to be documented in a Wikipedia article, it must be written about by other published reliable sources.

S0091 (talk) 00:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Webdesignsbynat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 00:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Doug Hiser

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Doug Hiser has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.doughiser.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. --Blablubbs (talk) 00:50, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a copyright infringement if I wrote the website. I was hired by the artist to create a wikipedia page he needs for a speaker role that reflects his website and his work.

Can you please reverse this? Webdesignsbynat (talk) 00:58, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has articles, not pages. Wikipedia has no interest in how the presence of a Wikipedia article may benefit your client- our only interest is in summarizing what independent reliable sources say about him, showing how he meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person.

The website at issue states that its content is under trademark and permission is required for its use- this is incompatible with Wikipedia's license, which allows for reuse for any purpose(including commercial) with attribution. If you wish to release the text for use under Wikipedia's license, you must first change the license on your client's website. (perhaps to WP:CC BY-SA). 331dot (talk) 06:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Widr (talk) 13:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]