Jump to content

User talk:WeJustWantToPlay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Criticism of Nintendo (November 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 06:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, WeJustWantToPlay! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 06:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi here AngusWoof, thanks so much for the quick review! I greatly appreciate it; here I was thinking I'd have to wait weeks, haha. Anyways to respond, having criticism in its own page is usually the pattern that I see with companies worth over $1B USD since their history is usually long and impact is very wide. Anyways, there's lots more to fill out, and I thought this would give basic material and structure to future contributors, as well as be a welcome addition to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Criticisms_of_companies. This is how criticism is handled for Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Uber, etc. I just brain dumped everything I could think of and even that is about the same length as the https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Criticism_of_Electronic_Arts, which is a similar type of company. Don't get me wrong, I'd love for this material to be a heading section over on the main Nintendo page, but I just don't think it would be a good place for this article to develop, given the slow nature of these main pages. Maybe later the page could switch homes, but it feels better to incubate the article in a separate area, especially since it falls into pattern with other criticism pages. Thoughts? WeJustWantToPlay (talk) 17:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, WeJustWantToPlay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Criticism of Nintendo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Criticism of Nintendo

[edit]

Hello, WeJustWantToPlay. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Criticism of Nintendo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]