User talk:Wdr3

December 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User_talk:EvergreenFir. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I am a student, but not here on assignment. I am here as a volunteer. Moreover, I reverted your edit because (1) you have a conflict of interest and (2) the solo image just shows him, not him with another person where it's not immediately clear which person is which. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reply: i'll post here to keep everything open. i dispute the allegation of conflict of interest, which is not made in good faith, it's simply an unsupported claim made behind the scenes, which borders on wiki-bullying. on EvergreenFir's talk page i outline the reasons why the photo and caption that i submitted pass the neutrality test for conflict of interest. on the same talk page i also address the two new issues raised by ef (1) not a solo photo, and (2) not clear who is who in the photo. since we're raising new issues to escalate the conflict (rather than openly looking at the situation) here's my escalation: as a photo, the picture i submitted is a higher quality visual composition, and it is not a crop of a subject taken out of context. by wdr3.

COI

Hello, Wdr3. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article William Donald Ross, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

This is in response to edits by User:Rogueaccount2013 and 64.142.37.160 on said page. User claims they made those edits here. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Wdr3. You have new messages at EvergreenFir's talk page.
Message added 01:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

EvergreenFir (talk) 01:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Wdr3. You have new messages at EvergreenFir's talk page.
Message added 02:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

EvergreenFir (talk) 02:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]