Jump to content

User talk:Wcfallon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As you wrote on the discussion page of the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET), you are from INET's strategic communications/PR firm and are working with INET to develop a more comprehensive wikipedia page. Thank you for revealing your conflict of interest. Please be aware that this is supposed to be an encyclopedia and you should not edit articles that you are professionally related to. You may however suggest improvements in the discussion. The article on INET is written like an advertisement and cannot remain as it is. Please make yourself familiar with wikipedia rules. First of all, read about the guidelines on conflicts of interest. There have been most lamentable experiences with colleagues of yours. Please do not create sockpuppets like you did with Keatingco. Knopffabrik (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Knopffabrik (talk) 04:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Substance of "New Economic Thinking outside the paradigm of efficient markets" 4 yrs after its inception ?

[edit]

Hello Wcfallon from the "INET's strategic communications/PR firm" I see it's been 3 years since your initial post. Can you please help to add substance to the INET wiki page, by describing INET's output/ summarizing INET activity since its inception 4 yrs ago(annual reports?) for us to better understand, what the "New Economic Thinking outside the paradigm of efficient markets" is about? INET's webpage isn't really shedding light. Or maybe it is, and I fail to see the new. Judging by its blogs and videos there's regurgitation of what has gone bad and what is going bad. For solutions there's same Lord Keynes written all over the place (e.g. permanent money creation),looking like a geriatric emperor without clothes, maybe clothed and perfumed by philanthropy.The only new thinking I have seen is in outside commentators of the blogs.--Wuerzele (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]