User talk:WazzaAzzaw

Talkpage

Leave me a message if you've any problems.

February 2013

Hello, I'm TCN7JM. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to this edit to Talk:Liverpool, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, –TC N7 JM 23:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting talk pages and leaving uncivil comments

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Article Protection

WazzaAzzaw, you requested page protection for African Elephant, I protected African elephant. One is a redirect to the other, thus they are different requests. Also, please maintain a civil conversation with others on their both on article talk pages and user talk pages. You have been warned already, and further disruptive behavior will lead to a block. Mike V • Talk 00:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that: But lets call a spade a shovel and admit, like adults, that African Elephant and African elephant are the same thing. You're kidding nobody with that pathetic attempt to hide the obvious. And I am being civil (majority of the time) but some users around here are getting on my ******.

You take care now, WazzaAzzaw (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are not the same article. He explained the difference. And being civil is not saying you're being civil and then calling his "attempt to hide the obvious" pathetic and attempting to swear at users like me. –TC N7 JM 00:28, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Outrageous accusation there; could you supply a "diff" please? WazzaAzzaw (talk) 00:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why yes. Yes I can. –TC N7 JM 00:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now sir. I hardly asked you to supply a diff for a comment directly above. The outrageous accusation is "attempting to swear at users like me." Show me ONE unprovoked instance of this please...??? WazzaAzzaw (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block Notice

After reviewing your user contributions and seeing that your account is less than a day old, I do not think that you have intentions to constructively contribute to Wikipedia. After your continued incivility, I have blocked your account indefinitely. If you wish to contest this block, you may do so and have an independent admin review this block. Mike V • Talk 00:35, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've not showed me how to contest the block. More incompetence. WazzaAzzaw (talk) 00:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It says: "The current block will automatically expire $6. You have many routes to appeal the block or its duration. Firstly, if you are a registered editor and have a valid e-mail address confirmed, you can e-mail $1. This feature can be removed if abused." here--http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Help:I_have_been_blocked under "Appealing.". Where do I email the $1 to? WazzaAzzaw (talk) 00:39, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may do so by copying {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}} on to your talk page. Please note that if you continue to ~~user~~ use your talk page inappropriately, your block may be extended to remove editing privileges of this page as well. Mike V • Talk 00:39, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"if you continue to user your talk page inappropriately" --How am I using it inappropriately? this is completely unfounded. WazzaAzzaw (talk) 00:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am referring to your uncivil tone, for which you were originally blocked. As you have requested an unblock request, I will leave this conversation so that I can attend elsewhere. Mike V • Talk 00:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WazzaAzzaw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Cos I didn't mean to :( WazzaAzzaw (talk) 00:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No valid unblock reason; you are done wasting other peoples' time here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:50, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.