User talk:Wawert

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Wawert! I'm Xinoph. I noticed that you were new and/or have yet to receive any messages so I just thought I'd pop in to say "hello". Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it's so big but we won't bite so Be Bold and get what you know down about U.S. politics! If you do make a mistake, that's fine, we'll assume good faith and just correct you: it'll take a few seconds maximum! Here, however, are a few links to get you started:

There are lots of policies and guidelines to get to grips with but they all make your life easier and your stay more fun in the long run. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? ;)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a great time, all the best, sayonara and good luck!

Politics of Piracy Intended Midterm Article

Intended Article: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment,_Inc._v._Connectix_Corporation

Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corporation revolved around the legality of reverse engineering Sony’s PSX hardware and firmware for commercial purposes. Specifically, Connectix reverse engineered the Playstation BIOS, which then became the foundation of Virtual Game Station, a Playstation emulator software designed for Mac. After VGS’s release, Sony filed for and successfully won an injunction against Connectix prohibiting further development or sale of the software. The two duked it out in court, with the Ninth Court of Appeals eventually ruling that Connectix’s reverse engineering equated to fair use.

The article cites exactly one source – the public domain released court opinion. In addition to adding more sources, I’d like to add a section summarizing contemporary video game journalism opinion about the case, as well as expand the section about ramifications going forward for the industry. Also, the article doesn’t discuss how good the Virtual Game Station actually was at emulating PS1 software – that strikes me as pertinent to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.229.107.17 (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]