User talk:Waving Wabbid

Waving Wabbid, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Waving Wabbid!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Screwy Squirrel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Warner Bros. Animation. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carniolus (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Warner Bros. films. Carniolus (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Bubsy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bubsy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ~Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:35, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mad (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mad (TV series) was changed by Waving Wabbid (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928344 on 2015-08-29T22:59:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cow and Chicken. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cow and Chicken was changed by Waving Wabbid (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951581 on 2015-08-30T03:42:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Warner Bros. Animation. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carniolus (talk) 09:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Captain Underpants. Diff: [1] You have previously been warned about adding unsourced content to articles and blocked for disruptive editing. Please do not submit unsourced content again, as this will result in your account again being blocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spring Breakers: The Second Coming

The article Spring Breakers: The Second Coming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Future films are not notable unless independent reliable sources confirm that principle photography has begun.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD^v2.0 15:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spring Breakers: The Second Coming

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Spring Breakers: The Second Coming, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SummerPhD^v2.0 15:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:28, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability is a key Wikipedia policy. You need to provide sources for your edits. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wendy Wu: Homecoming Warrior. Dubious, unreferenced and verification failed on stuff entered. Looks bogus to me Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]