User talk:Watnick

September 2020

Hello, I'm Jacob Gotts. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2020 United States presidential debates have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 05:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Wallace, you may be blocked from editing. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 05:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chris Wallace, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 United States presidential debates. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 United States presidential debates. You can't seriously think this belongs in the article. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Chris Wallace, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at 2020 United States presidential debates, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chris Wallace; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 United States presidential debates. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2020 United States presidential debates. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Chris Wallace. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Chris Wallace. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

What's the difference between a parrot and your editing? power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Power~enwiki: Tell me. {

\mathbb {JPG}

} 06:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Power~enwiki: Still waiting on this one... jp×g 10:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see, I have to ping @力:. jp×g 11:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Glen (talk) 06:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have immediately come back off your block and started inserting the same personal commentary. Last chance, do it again and you'll be blocked indefinitely. Glen (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Glen (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]