User talk:Vəssel

Theta vacuum

Hi Wasp's String!

Concerning your technical label on the article theta vacuum, I would say that this is unwarranted. The article is only technical because the topic is technical, not because it is written in a technical manner. It is impossible to understand the topic to any real extent unless you have a good familiarity with quantum field theory, something the general audience does not have. This article falls into the category on Wikipedia of articles that are by their nature are technical and thus are an exception to that rule; Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable itself mentions the existence of such articles. Most advanced mathematics and theoretical physics falls into this cateogry. The article is written in a way that makes it possible to understand to the broadest possible audience without loosing any of the necessary details (hence in this case the broadest possible audience are people who understand quantum field theory). OpenScience709 (talk) 15:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see I wasn't fully aware of the use of the template. Thank you for our helpful explanation. The Wasp ^{[my nest]} 15:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :) Have fun editing! OpenScience709 (talk) 16:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse question

It appears you figured out how to do what you asked about. I can tell you changed your name, but did you succeed in finding everything?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I decided the question seemed inappropriate but I got someone else to revert to see if reverts worked the way I thought.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]