User talk:Warlock Wrath

December 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Warlocks Motorcycle Club (Pennsylvania). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where you get your info from , but I have full verifiable evidence if Wiki chooses to ask me about it . Verifiable from newspaper/magazine articles , websites, bylaws of the MC , and also being a full patched member of this MC.

Warlock Wrath (talk) 20:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Warlocks Motorcycle Club (Pennsylvania). Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have all the verifiable evidence needed. Copies of Trademarks , LLC paperwork, verified bank statements, And any other evidence needed. Please refrain from changing the info posted by reverting back to information that is outdated or unverifiable. You can and will be banned from making revisions for your continued reverts to old or unverifiable information. Warlock Wrath (talk) 20:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Warlocks Motorcycle Club (Pennsylvania), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Warlock Wrath. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding an edit war

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Warlocks Motorcycle Club (Pennsylvania). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]