User talk:Warezalex911

This is Warezalex911's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Bird (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please indicate how this person meets notability for journalist WP:NJOURNALIST

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Bird and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AngusWOOF, Daniel Bird is a British journalist, working at the Mirror as well as previously editing at the Daily Star. https://www.google.com/search?q=daniel+bird&rlz=1C5GCEM_enGB1029GB1030&ei=cRInZKzeCNCXgQak7rC4Aw&ved=0ahUKEwjs2puJ04b-AhXQS8AKHSQ3DDcQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=daniel+bird&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQ6CAgAEIAEELADOhAILhCKBRDIAxCwAxCRAhgBOg0ILhCABBDIAxCwAxgBSgQIQRgBUKQBWKQBYPYCaAFwAHgAgAFQiAFQkgEBMZgBAKABAcgBEcABAdoBBggBEAEYCA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp Warezalex911 (talk) 17:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Warezalex911! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Bird (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Did you have a chance to read WP:NJOURNALIST yet? That is the guideline on notability for journalists. Significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources are required. Links to his articles / profiles at newspapers he has worked for are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Bird and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:59, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea, apologies. Please find links to various news outlets with stories about Daniel:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/my-pal-sarah-hardings-friendship-24927207

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz/sarah-harding-never-realised-just-25396565

https://www.irishmirror.ie/showbiz/celebrity-news/my-pal-sarah-hardings-friendship-24928480

https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2017-05-11/daniels-story-a-battle-with-anorexia

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/health/im-considering-having-hair-transplant-24771761 Warezalex911 (talk) 18:10, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Bird (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft has no sources that are independent and secondary. Multiple such sources are required to show notability. Please see the previous comments as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Bird and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Bird (April 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 12:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Bird

Hello, Warezalex911. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Bird".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]