User talk:Warcrimesexpert

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of war crimes. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Duncan^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not so. Edit genuine. Thanks. Warcrimesexpert (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to List of war crimes constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 22:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to List of war crimes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Dick (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for having a misleading username and for unexplained removal of content. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Mifter (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Warcrimesexpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's not misleading. I'm an all-out expert on war crimes and I want the chance to prove it if you unblock me.

Decline reason:

Confirmed as a sockpuppet: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Z Victor Alpha. —DoRD (?) (talk) 23:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.