User talk:War

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited World Archery Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Las Vegas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring Military Bases in Washington

You're registered, so do you want to do it? Ill do it otherwise. Ive had issues with the appratchiks here before so Im loath to register. If an admin will delete a category just for shits and grins without any sort of justification something's wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.49.197 (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed)War (talk) 08:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

William Leveson/recycle

Could you give William Leveson/recycle a day or so, until we've fully debugged/understood/explained things to T13? (See: User talk:RHaworth#William Leveson/recycle, User talk:Technical_13#Declined_speedy, WP:HD#Eliminating a redirect). —Sladen (talk) 09:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waqf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imam Muhammad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an interesting problem. The mistake I made is linking to Imam Muhammad, when it should have been linked to Muhammad. The problem is what to do about the honorific? Also, what to do about the statement that follows which looks like an interpretation of a statement in the Koran which is attributed to Muhammad? Fixing this is tricky.War (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-Band Excitation

Already on the list of speech codecs. Didn't you look? Warped War (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take another look. Perhaps you were looking at the wrong place. I was looking here: Comparison of audio formats. My main concern is that the AMBE codec is represented. Which, look again, isn't.War (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added it. It still needs to be added to the technical details section.War (talk) 16:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry

I wish to apologize for harassing you. I've thought about it, and decided that my behavior is / was both unjustified, obnoxious, and uncalled for. I'm sure you think this is just more bullshit, but I really do want to walk away from this nonsense that *indeed* I created. You have my word - for what it is worth - that I will not engage in this type of bad behavior in the future. There is no excuse, but none the less, I feel I owe you an apology - which you are under no obligation to accept and I would expect you not to. I will not vandalize your Talk or Personal page again, I will not "stalk" your editing. Warped War (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok...I'm happy to devote my time here to learning new things and helping to make Wikipedia the worlds most awesome and accurate body of knowledge. I'm very happy to see you editing articles. I've learned that unsourced opinions (mine in some cases), are not adequate and I will strive to always bring sourced facts to the table. Happy editing! War (talk) 05:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Comparison of programming languages (mapping) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. Thanks BracketBot! War (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I would like your opinion on a subject that is near to my heart at Wikipedia, and that is the issue of “trivia” and the difference between “trivia” and “In Public Culture” and similar section titles. It's my opinion that for the most part, “In Public Culture” sections are a way around a general “dislike” for “trivia” sections, but that the content is the same, that the two titles are synonyms. Wikipedia “discourages” so-called “trivia” but does not disallow it. My point is that “In Public Culture” is almost always “trivia”, and we should strive for honesty. If it's “Trivia”, call it “Trivia”. I feel that it is disingenuous to call trivia “In Public Culture” simply because it is considered “low class”. I say, call it what it is or get rid of it. Your opinion? By the way, again, I'm sorry for being a “douche” to you in the past, I'm working on not being “passive aggressive” ... Am I barking up the wrong tree here? =//= Johnny Squeaky 03:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think trivia is a waste of brain cells and a waste of time. However, there is some trivia that is the "common knowledge" and then perhaps worth mentioning. I probably wouldn't mention it but people (fans) of the topic might consider the information to be very important. I'm having a tough time thinking of an example so I'll make one up. Let's say you invent Sham Wow II and become rich and famous. You get your own Wiki page and your face on the cover of all the magazines you see in the grocery store isle. Next, pretend you own an orange cat named "Shammy". That fact would be trivia. I don't think it belongs on your wiki page. On the other hand, say one night Shammy decides to sleep on your face (as cats will do) and you suffocated to death...then Shammy may be of some historical and cultural significance. I could conceive of a "In Public Culture" section of the article where a "Shammy" is referred to in popular culture as a "particularly embarrassing death" or when people started giving people they hate orange cats as passive-aggressive way of saying, "choke on this". If you give me an article that illustrates what you are talking about I'll look at and give you a better answer. I hope that was helpful.War (talk) 06:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amish Mafia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brethren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone fixed it already. War (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Atheism

Isn't that wp:synth, taking the percentage of who agree with You believe there is a God and calling the remainder as did not agree with the stand "I believe there is a God". I wouldn't call the ones who answered You believe there is some sort of spirit or life force exactly atheist either. I would think that the ones who agree with You don’t believe there is any sort of spirit, God or life force would be the number to display. What do you think? I assume you are referring to pg 381 of the Eurobarometer document? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, War and Jim1138. I've started a new section in the talk about this topic. Maybe we can talk there. --Robert Laymont (talk) 15:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll put my comments over there. War (talk) 16:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CrossFit Games (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CrossFit Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 03:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! War, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 03:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

gotta love templates...." new editors like yourself" it says. I guess editing for 18 years isn't long enough.War (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Converting notes into text

If you are going to convert notes into article text, as in this edit, please remember to take off the closing tag along with the opening tag. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 12:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CrossFit Games concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CrossFit Games, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CrossFit Games

Hello, War. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "CrossFit Games".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:CrossFit Games}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My draft was copied word-for-word by another user with added some references and re-submitted it. It exists as an article now. To bad I don't get any credit for my work. :-(. War (talk) 01:04, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, War. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Would you mind considering...

The IP to which you responded at talk:x86-64, 175.19.66.153 , is a confirmed sockpuppet of long-indef-blocked LTA Janagewen. (See his SPI archive, as well as his block log here at en, and also at five other WM projects, and finally, a global lock on all other WikiMedia projects as seen here). This most recent IP has already been blocked but he will no doubt show up under another IP soon. I strongly recommend Revert-Block-Ignore, consistent with WP:DENY and WP:DFTT. There is no possible good that can come of engaging with him, even on the rare occasions when he makes a constructive comment or suggestion. RBI and move on. Jeh (talk) 08:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. War (talk) 04:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, War. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Women's History Barnstar
		Belated applause for the article you created on Jenijoy La Belle. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! War (talk) 02:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, War. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rocketry Invitation

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's rocketry-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Rocketry? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's rocketry-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox RPG focus

Can you please answer my question on Xbox's talk page as you suggested? thanks Grandia01 (talk) 07:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the talk page of the article page, so that other editors can chime in also.War (talk) 07:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Xbox_Series_X_and_Series_S#RPG_focus

X86-64

Sorry, I meant on *my* talk page here: User_talk:Vladsinger#Please_correct_57_bit_canonical_addresses_image. I'm going to step out of this debate now since I don't know the subject well enough, but I think they were right - the previous caption on the image was inconsistent, needs to be 56 bit and 56 bit diagram (which you reverted to) or the 57 bit and what they claim to be the correct diagram for the 57 bit design. Take it up with User talk:96.231.211.13 if there's a debate about it. vlad§inger ^tlk 01:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jessica Pohly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welcome to the Family. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

And the fact that it isn't a real encyclopedia article is the reason it isn't allowed to be in categories, because categories are only for real encyclopedia articles and not for sandbox pages. Bearcat (talk) 22:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your patience. I fixed it.War (talk) 02:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]