User talk:WaqasT

WaqasT, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WaqasT! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ProcessModel (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! I have declined this article because I feel that you have inserted as many references as possible in an attempt to meet the notability criteria. This is strongly discouraged- see WP:REFSPAM. You should focus on clearly showing, in a neutral tone, how this software meets that criteria and remove references from unreliable sources. For a guide, see here. Thanks again for submitting an article to Wikipedia; if you feel you have any questions, please drop a message on my talk page or at the WP:Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ProcessModel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ProcessModel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ProcessModel. Thanks! NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ProcessModel (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The concern is that this would need reviews to finally convince accepting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ProcessModel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]