User talk:Waltersamedical
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Waltersamedical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not make even a single edit in Article pages. All of my edits are in Talk pages. The blockers suggest the idea of similarities between edits. The reverters with different wiki-user names in article pages can also be seen to have some sort of similarities. This way of reasoning does not suffice to block a wiki-user who did not make even a single edit in article pages. If wikipedia does not have any freedom environment to edits in talk pages, who has? Tell me, so that I can make edits in that Xpedia!
Decline reason:
You are clearly the same person as Justice Forever. I have no idea why you think it is relevant that you have edited only talk pages. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Waltersamedical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not make even a single edit in Article pages. All of my edits are in Talk pages. The blockers suggest the idea of similarities between edits. The reverters with different wiki-user names in article pages can also be seen to have some sort of similarities. This way of reasoning does not suffice to block a wiki-user who did not make even a single edit in article pages. If wikipedia does not have any freedom environment to edits in talk pages, who has? Tell me, so that I can make edits in that Xpedia/Freepedia! Also, JamesBWatson, there is a giant difference to edit-approach. You say "clearly the same person" and "I have no idea why ...". Shouldn't you be sure in all aspects to continue to block a wiki-user like me? JamesBWatson, please look at the other different characteristics of editing with me and the person I am claimed to imitate. Please review your block decision once again. Thanks.
Decline reason:
Your reasons for unblocking seem to be (a) you are not making any useful edits, but only arguing in talk page, and (b) You believe that it is your 'right' to have the 'freedom' to edit web sites, even if they do not belong to you. Neither of these appears to be a clear reason that this block is inappropriate, or a reason to doubt that you are the same human being who was using the account User:Justice Forever. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Waltersamedical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- I did not make even a single edit in Article pages. All of my edits are in Talk pages. The blockers suggest the idea of similarities between edits. The reverters with different wiki-user names in article pages can also be seen to have some sort of similarities. This way of reasoning does not suffice to block a wiki-user who did not make even a single edit in article pages. If wikipedia does not have any freedom environment to edits in talk pages, who has? Tell me, so that I can make edits in that Xpedia/Freepedia!
- JamesBWatson, there is a giant difference to edit-approach. You say "clearly the same person" and "I have no idea why ...". Shouldn't you be sure in all aspects to continue to block a wiki-user like me? JamesBWatson, please look at the other different characteristics of editing with me and the person I am claimed to imitate. Please review your block decision once again. Thanks.
- FisherQueen, "Are you the authority to determine whether an edit is useful or not?"; (An edit that comes to you as unuseful may surely very helpful for the others!)
"How do you guarantee that after arguing enough in Talk Page, I will still not make a useful edit in article page?" (Without enough arguing in Talk Pages, the edits to the article page are generally reverted by the reasoning of the lack of enough consensus);
You say "You believe that ... ". No, I do not believe as you claim. If from my writings you undestood my thoughts like that, that is only from my lack of English. Editing the Talk Pages for further contribution to article pages of Wikipedia before an edit in article page is a "right" in Wikipedia as long as that Talk Page is not mis-used, isn't it so? Please review my block once more.
Decline reason:
(1) It doesn't matter that all your edits are on talk pages. There is no "freedom environment" here; find some chat board or political forum or something somewhere else. (2) You already asked that, it was denied. (2) Yes, FisherQueen has exactly the authority to determine whether an edit is useful or not, as does any editor here. There are no rights on Wikipedia other than the right to leave and the right to fork. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:59, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
By 'useful,' I mean, 'An edit which makes the encyclopedia better.' You said yourself that you have not edited the encyclopedia itself. If I'm mistaken, and you have made an edit that makes the encyclopedia better.... I still think you are probably the same person as User:Justice Forever, which is the reason for your block. People who use multiple accounts nearly always lie about it, so, unfortunately, we have to take the evidence into account as well as what each user says. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)