User talk:Walter white502930291

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walter white502930291 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never attacked anyone on my time on Wikipedia I just implied that certain people where changing my articles without discussion I apologize for my actions if they offended someoneWalter white502930291 (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I've never called all albanians fascist just the ones who vandilize and don't want to talk threw the talk page" is quite enough to indicate your willingness to attack other users. "I apologize if" is not an apology. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walter white502930291 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for what have I said and done in my time on Wikipedia I will make sure that incidents like that will never happen again I am aware of what I've done and said and I apologize Walter white502930291 (talk) 00:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walter white502930291 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for name calling and edit waring on Wikipedia I understand what I did was wrong and I apologize I promise in the future this won't happen again and I will make useful changes and I will stop edit waringWalter white502930291 (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|reason=I have been blocked for name calling and edit waring on Wikipedia I understand what I did was wrong and I apologize I promise in the future this won't happen again and I will make useful changes and I will stop edit waring

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walter white502930291 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am aware that I have been blocked for name calling and edit waring I am very sorry for what I've done and I won't do it again Walter white502930291 (talk) 00:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not given any specifics, and in the below conversation, defend your personal attack rather than apologizing for it (it doesn't matter if you called all of some group fascists, you should not be referring to any other editor as a "fascist". I've strongly considered revoking your talk page access here, and if your next unblock request is not specific and convincing about how you really do understand what happened and what exactly you will do different, that's very likely to be the result here. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walter white502930291 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for edit waring and name calling other people on wikipedia i am aware what I did was wrong I am verry sorry and I won't do it again Walter white502930291 (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are deliberately wasting our time. One open unblock request at a time. It actively hurts your case when you open up multiple simultaneous unblock requests, it demonstrates you lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 14:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Walter white502930291, more detail is needed in your unblock request for admin to assess this request. Admin need to feel confident that you understand what you did wrong, and that you will not do it again. Please answer the following questions below:

What specifically was the behaviour that led to the block, and why was it inappropriate?
What is edit warring and why is it not allowed on Wikipedia? (See WP:EW)
How should editors resolve disputes on article content? (See WP:DR)
What are personal attacks and why are they not allowed on Wikipedia? (See WP:PR)
Why is it inappropriate for editors to remove controversial, cited material from articles, and how can they achieve consensus for the material to be removed?
If unblocked, what articles do you hope to edit in the future? Are these in different topic areas from the articles that led to your block?

I look forward to your answers. Z1720 (talk) 01:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm StephenMacky1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 22:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Raduša, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Excutient^Talk 20:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Local hero ^talk 21:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topic notice: Eastern Europe and the Balkans

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Battle of Raduša—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sir I wanted to add the Kosovo Protection Corps to the units involved I had the sources but something went wrong I have made over 20 edits trying to fix it I am having trouble with it Walter white502930291 (talk) 12:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of Vaksince. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have multiple sources for the battle that it was a Macedonian victory but Wikipedia won't let me save them for some reson Walter white502930291 (talk) 06:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Battle of Vaksince. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 06:53, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "unsourced"

I added a source if you do not want to read the sources I suggest you don't even go on the Wikipedia becouse mindless edits won't change anything Walter white502930291 (talk) 06:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of Vaksince. Materialscientist (talk) 06:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://reliefweb.int/organization/iwpr here's this source

While you have no sources eeeh what can I say you are sourcless Walter white502930291 (talk) 07:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That link says nothing about the fact you are claiming. Materialscientist (talk) 07:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it's been 3 minutes how on earth did you even read the whole thing Walter white502930291 (talk) 07:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't. A link to a general website is not a reference. Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Aračinovo crisis. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 22:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Aračinovo crisis) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing content without discussion

You need to start using talk pages to discuss and explain what you are doing when you remove sourced content from articles. Otherwise it looks very much like you are removing things simply because you disagree with it, which is disruptive editing and will get you a permanent block. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Escape Orbit Blocks are not "permanent" which suggests they can never be removed, they are "indefinite" meaning they have no specific end date. 331dot (talk) 12:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enough already with the name calling, the harassment ("Albanian fascists"), and the battleground attitude. Drmies (talk) 16:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've never called all albanians fascist just the ones who vandilize and don't want to talk threw the talk page Walter white502930291 (talk) 20:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why I should be unblocked

i have never intended to offend anyone when I try to edit Wikipedia I first use the talk page then I edit I don't relise why I should be blocked when the people who actually vandalize aren't, when I say "albanian fascists" I don'tean that all albanians are fascist and I've never said that Walter white502930291 (talk) 20:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to make an unblock request as instructed above for it to be reviewed. 331dot (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what it means by "bottom of my talk page" Walter white502930291 (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of using the reply function, open the edit window by clicking "edit" at the top of the screen. 331dot (talk) 20:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on mobile Walter white502930291 (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you to view Wikipedia in full desktop mode on your mobile, in a browser(that's what I do when on a device) but if necessary you may use the reply function to make your request(it just introduces some formatting issues but they can be fixed). The mobile version is great for reading but less so for editing. 331dot (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much have a blessed day or night Walter white502930291 (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]