User talk:Wallnut tree
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]Hi Wallnut tree! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Disambiguation link notification for November 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suleyman Kerimov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Account (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to QCLN may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Edge® Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN)|publisher=First Trust Portfolios|accessdate=March 18, 2014}}</ref>. There are a total of 42 stocks in the ETF that come from a wide range of niche sectors,
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 12:14, Thursday, November 28, 2024 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABC Supply, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consulting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Euronext changes
[edit]Hello, I have two questions about your edits of the article Euronext. 1) In section Acquisition of Liffe you've modified all references to Liffe Connect to be UTP. I have not found any sources siting that the exchanges in the section listed have migrated to UTP, and all the references sited identify the trading platforms as Liffe Connect. I believe that currently CME / CBOT are now running on a different trading platform altogether. Would you mind if that gets reverted back to Liffe Connect? 2) You've changed the name of the company to be Euronext Group. I didn't see in the article sited the new name. Are you sure the company has changed its name? Besenok (talk) 08:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, Regarding your second question, you are right, the article does not mention the exact name “Euronext Group” but the use of Euronext N.V. is also no longer appropriate considering the group’s status changed legally after its acquisition by ICE. The article states that Euronext would soon become independent, and hence Euronext Group, but perhaps I did jump the gun by renaming it Euronext Group before an official press release. I propose to change it to “Euronext” for the time being until the official press release with the change of name is released. It is referred to as Euronext in the FT article I have cited. Does this work for you?
As goes for Liffe Connect, I actually found a document that I forgot to cite, in which it states in the introduction that “The NYSE Euronext Universal Trading Platform (UTP) is replacing all legacy European and U.S. Cash and Derivatives Trading Platforms. The implementation is phased by business and location, having started with the European Cash markets at the end of 2008." • Wallnut tree (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2014 (GMT +1)
For the name - thank you.
For UTP - There is a difference between NYSE Euronext announcing that they moved their own platforms to UTP vs. what their customers decided to do. For example Warsaw was also an old customer of NYSE Technologies for their previous trading platform, but didn't switch to UTP until 2013.
Liffe.connect was the Derivative trading platform. I believe CME moved all their subsidiaries to their own trading platform as soon as they could, and never transferred to UTP. Here are the links I've found so far on their clients.
- CBOT uses CME Globex
http://www.cmegroup.com/company/cbot.html "CME Group brings buyers and sellers together through the CME Globex electronic trading platform" http://www.cmegroup.com/confluence/display/EPICSANDBOX/CME+Globex
- Minneapolis
http://www.cmegroup.com/international/partnership-resources/mgex-resources.html "The agreement allows MGEX Hard Red Spring Wheat futures trading activity to be conducted exclusively on the CME Globex trading platform"
- Kansas City (2012)
http://investor.cmegroup.com/investor-relations/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=724476 "Beginning today, CME and CBOT members and KCBT permit holders will immediately benefit from the ability to trade each other's wheat futures and options products in a more cost-effective manner on the CME Globex electronic trading platform"
To the contrary, the following did switch to UTP:
- Warsaw accepts UTP
http://nysetechtalk.com/?nyse_article=warsaw-stock-exchange-goes-global-with-utp-2 http://www.world-exchanges.org/news-views/warsaw-stock-exchange-formally-accepts-utp-system
- Luxembourg Stock Exchange
Appears to have UTP, and no mention of migration (so far) to any other platform https://www.bourse.lu/luxembourg-stock-exchange-history "The Luxembourg Stock Exchange successfully migrated all securities listed on its two markets, the regulated market and the Euro MTF market, to the Universal Trading Platform or UTP of NYSE Euronext"
- Qatar Exchange
http://www.qe.com.qa/pps/qe/qe+english+portal/Pages/Investor+Corner/UTP "Qatar Exchange will migrate from its current trading platform Horizon to UTP (Universal Trading Platform) on September 5th 2010."
- Press release on MENA exchanges moving to UTP.
http://www.nyse.com/press/1395073823962.html Besenok (talk) 22:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the information, it is definitely very useful and updates should certainly be made on the Wikipedia page. In light of these facts I propose the following: 1) Since the page concerns Euronext, and its migration to the UTP, I suggest deleting the information about the Kansas City Board of Trade and Minneapolis Grain Exchange since it is incorrect and they did not migrate to UTP. 2) Then to add a couple of lines about those who did switch to UTP, specifically Warsaw stock exchange, Luxembourg stock exchange, Qatar and four MENA exchanges.
I will make the changes but if you disagree then we can discuss further. Wallnut tree (talk) 13:23, 8 April 2014 (GMT+1)
After doing some additional research, I changed the UTP references back to LIFFE CONNECT as that was the system being utilised at the time, and added a new paragraph about those exchanges that did switch to UTP. Wallnut tree (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2014 (GMT+1) All definitely works. Thank you very much. I feel kind of guilty that you're making all of the changes, but I didn't want to impose any changes without checking with you first. Besenok (talk) 18:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
No problem! Happy to help and make sure all the information is accurate. Quick question: since the information has now been updated since 2012, as well as the recent ICE acquisition, is it possible to remove the banner at the top that states information is out of date? Or does somebody else have to do it? Wallnut tree (talk) 10:52, 15 April 2014 (GMT+1)
Nomination of Sergei Ivanovich Vasiliev for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sergei Ivanovich Vasiliev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergei Ivanovich Vasiliev (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VolgaCamper (talk) 18:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
WikiProject Investment
[edit]Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.
The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.
Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.
Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 20:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)