User talk:Wallah96

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. Outsider2810 05:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in France

You recently removed a large portion of the article Islam in France without explanation. I suggest that you get consensus the talk page before nuking such vast quantities of text and information. Althought that section was possibly POV, that does not excuse wholesale deleting it. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 23:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom case

Hi, please see here[1], and submit your evidence (only) in a different section, if you feel appropriate.Zmmz 19:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zakir Naik

You may not realize it, but I have been trying to keep the article fair. That means removing criticisms if they're put in the wrong places. Please try to return the fairness and stop putting rebuttals in the criticism section.

Also, your insistence on posting links to Naik books and videos in every possible place in the article amounts to linkspamming. The amount of pro and anti material should be proportionate! There's even a WP policy against doing this: WP:Spam where it says, "Adding many links to (or mentions of) the same site or product. Going through an article and adding the name of your product to every paragraph where it seems relevant is just going to attract the revert button."

You are trying to use the article to promote Zakir Naik. That's just as wrong as using the article to trash Zakir Naik. Let's just give both sides and leave it alone, OK? You could spend your time working on other articles relating to India, Islam, or Indian Islam. I don't know how you feel about Sufism and popular festivals, but the Indian section in the article on Ziyarat is probably not complete. Zora 03:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No more vandalising Zakir Naik

Wallah, if you vandalise Zakir Naik again, I am going to report you. Outsider2810Outsider2810

Image copyright problem with Image:Free_bulletjack_flipbook.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Free_bulletjack_flipbook.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]