User talk:WalkerWon
Hi, I like thhe articles on Wikipedia. I made In Search of the Wow Wow Wibble Woggle Wazzie Woodle Woo, John Peter Smith Hospital, Valentin Stepankov and Chili grenades.
The Greenskeeper, 900 series, Natalya Rudakova, and Jacqueline Gagne are also articles I am in favor of.
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MastCell Talk 22:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Don't believe Daedalus about this. I created an account originally called Jayhawk of Justice. I got blocked for six months on that account. Why? Because Daedalus made me angry because he attempted to have an article I created deleted. Not just once, but four times. He tried a speedy once and then three votes. On the fourth attempt, the article called Natalya Rudakova was redirected against consensus. All of this is documented on those deletion attempt pages. But that wasn't enough for him. Some guy comes along and calls Daedalus some names. Even though that account called user:Munging is my life (or something like that) was not me, no cheeckuser was ever done, and I never created a name that filthy, I was further punished for it by having my talk page locked, my IP address blocked for many months, and Daedalus was very quick to create all sorts of templates and metapages accusing me of bein a sockpuppet. Then I create this account many months later. I'm trying to start over. And what happens? Daedalus is at it again. Look at his edit history. He has a clear pattern of seeking out new users and previously blocked users and manipulating the rules to knock those users off course and off the Wikipedia project. He should be banned. I create articles. He just deletes them and attacks people. He is a net negative for Wikipedia. He adds little content. He just goes around badgering people and wastes other users time by having to clean up his messes. I am willing to wait another six months and ask again to continue editing.At some point though, someone should ask if it is right that editors creating articles are being blocked while some other editor who fancies himself a Wikipedia crusader stirs up trouble nearly every day. Even his claim to have gone a whopping five days without an argument is false, as he has removed information from people's pages falsely and tried to bait users and attempted to abuse checkuser on multiple occassions. WalkerWon (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
A clean start huh? Since when did a clean start involve harassing me on my talk page, the exact same thing you were blocked for the first time around. Not to mention stalking my edits.
That doesn't sound like a clean start to me.— Dædαlus Contribs 00:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Valentin Stepankov has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)