User talk:Waker1985

Inappropriate use of multiple accounts

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already warned you that your use of this account for vandalism patrol was an invalid clean start. I asked you to either declare the connection between your accounts or to cease the activities that led to noticeboard discussions and explicit requests from admins for you to refrain from patrolling under your original account. Your response was to blank my message and upload a recent change patrol script. As such, I've blocked this account. You can either appeal this block and agree to refrain from patrolling, or you can return to your original account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ponyo, I sincerely applogize for my actions and That wan't a recent change patrol script, my talk page is setup for automatic archiving. I also will ensure that this will never happens again. unfortunately The Operating System on my computer keeps on crashing and i was unable to declare declare the connection to User:Chip3004. Waker1985 (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Waker1985 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I reliaze that what i did is not ok, I agree to refrain from patrolling. Waker1985 (talk) 03:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; this user has an ongoing ArbCom appeal and the on-wiki appeal appears to contain less information than that appeal. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Waker1985 (talk) 03:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ponyo I truly regret what i did, my actions is what that caused my account to be blocked in the in the first place, I did not ever upload an Patrol Script at all, My talk page was already setup to be archived. Waker1985 (talk) 21:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I warned you at 21:05 UTC. At 21:43 UTC you created your .js page with the Lupin patrol script, followed by creating your .css page with the Lupin patrol script at 21:45 and the full script at 21:51. You then blanked my warning at 21:53 and started patrolling with Twinkle the next day. This has nothing to do with the archive bot you use to blank your talk page (not archive them). Interesting that you had computer issues that prevented you from declaring your account, but you had no problem downloading patrol script, reverting edits and making an AIV report before I blocked you. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]