User talk:Waft Studios

This is Waft Studios's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niraj Vikram (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niraj Vikram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Niraj Vikram, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brother what is your problem, Neeraj Vikram is a big writer about whom I am writing article, why are you deleting it again and again? Request you please do not remove the article Waft Studios (talk) 12:10, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Waft Studios! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation warning

If you haven't already seen it, please read the warning message on your Commons talk page - c:User_talk:Waft_Studios#You_may_be_blocked_soon. You CANNOT continue to upload copyrighted images and falsely claim they are "Own work". Ravensfire (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Reshma Pasupuleti, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WP:SELFPUB blog sites shouldn't be used for BLPs. -- Ab207 (talk) 11:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Reshma Pasupuleti. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Not a single sources passes WP:RS; please see WP:ICTFSOURCES for a list of acceptable sources Ab207 (talk) 12:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kajal Kali per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bikrookanpurgangster. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]