Jump to content

User talk:WTaQ179C

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

WTaQ179C (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19060 was submitted on Aug 25, 2017 09:06:34. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 09:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

WTaQ179C (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19757 was submitted on Nov 13, 2017 05:43:11. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 05:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia as a blog, web host, social networking site, forum or a memorial site.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Just Chilling (talk) 01:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WTaQ179C (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because the account that I have made is not connected with the previous account I made and that was for a test only. I should have deleted that first account. The reason that I believe would be valid is the IP address that you always accused me a couple of times now.

Decline reason:

So all of these were for tests only? You've spent years spamming Wikipedia, and haven't done anything else at all with this account, for almost a thousand edits. You haven't addressed that , and you won't be unblocked unless you can convince us that those issues won't recur. Huon (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WTaQ179C (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, is there any other way you can remove the block?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Any more time-wasting requests and you'll lose your talk page access. Yamla (talk) 20:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to blank the declines for your existing block. --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]