User talk:WLPERD

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of DarlieB (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--slakr^\ talk / 05:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WLPERD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not the user but I agree with her edit. The accusations of original research were untrue and I proved in the discussion area before I made a single edit. By pulling up the edit before that showed it was not even from her . I suppose you can continue to ban anyone who disagrees but honestly , it's rather pointless as this is a cartoon and the original descriptions of that section were perfectly accurate. It's fine for CTJF83 , Grsz11 ,to enlist Pedro do to reverts to avoid 3RR but not anyone else. Incredible hypocrisy as I don't see you banning Pedro as a *sockpuppet* yet that is exactly what he did , revert without any explanation.

Decline reason:

Very likely sockpuppet per WP:DUCK. Sandstein 08:59, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WLPERD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So this is the scientific method for determining sock puppetry ? The duck test ?! So appropriate as it was also used by medieval villagers to burn witches ! I suppose that test applies to you as well so perhaps it is valid .

Decline reason:

Wrong duck test! This is the one that says "if it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, it's likely a duck." So, yeah, it applies to us also. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.