User talk:WBJB03

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WBJB03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What did I do wrong?; I want to post wikilove, but I can't; I can't even edit my own profile; and the network you blocked goes to a school. WBJB03 (talk) 16:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You damaged two templates, and you posted negative comments on the user pages of two administrators. I don't believe for a moment that you are a new user, or that you have any intent to contribute positively to this project. Showering yourself with wiki-love messages does nothing to change that impression.I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apart from two edits that damaged templates (and were quickly reverted), every single edit you've made has been to your own user and talk pages. If that's all you want to do, have at - you can still edit this page. If not, what do you plan to edit if unblocked? Do you understand why your edits were problematic? UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 17:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WBJB03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want another chance.WBJB03 (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We will need an indication that you understand the reason for your block, and an indication as to how your future editing will be different, if we are to consider unblocking you. Have you read the guide to appealing blocks, as suggested above? JamesBWatson (talk) 16:47, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WBJB03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are blocking a school network so you need to unblock me and I agree to everything. WBJB03 (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, we don't. And agree to what? — Joseph Fox 19:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WBJB03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. WBJB03 (talk) 14:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You still refuse to acknowledge why you were blocked, which was disrupting Wikipedia. Talk page editing revoked; please mature much more before attempting to touch Wikipedia again. If you get in trouble in school, then that is your fault and not ours. –MuZemike 14:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Love to give ideas WBJB03 (talk) 15:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Is nice WBJB03 (talk) 16:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Excels at English WBJB03 (talk) 16:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Density of fresh water concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Density of fresh water, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Density of fresh water

Hello WBJB03. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Density of fresh water.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Density of fresh water}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]