User talk:WALIDHADDAD

Welcome

Hi and welcome. I hope your article creation and editing goes well. One thing, Wikipedia articles do not receive "bylines". Don't sign your articles. When you make comments on an article's discussion/talk page, do sign your comments with the four tildes to stamp with your username and the time and date. Thanks. Welcome again and happy editing. MKoltnow 19:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing. I've used a tool called a redirect which is really useful. It automatically points people to the article you want them to read, even if you've named your article slightly differently. This way, only one version of the article needs to remain on the server--all the other names for the article are instant pointers to it. It is very difficult to maintain multiple versions of the same article, so we use redirects to keep all the edits in one place. Welcome again, and happy editing. MKoltnow 19:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your advices. --Walid HADDAD 20:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, WALIDHADDAD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Danski14 23:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saad Sami Haddad

There are several things wrong with this article. First, it may not meet wikipedia Notablity criteria for Biographies. You need to explain why he is notably, in an unbiased (NPOV) way. Since he is your father, many editors may see a Conflict of Interest. To establish notability, you should try to cite a variety of sources, including secondary sources. Finally, the article needs some general cleanup, such as section headings and interwiki links. You can read more about that on the Manual of Stly found here. You will notice I also tagged this article as "linkless". The "linkless" tag is common for new articles and is usually added eventually by an automated system. It just means you should create some internal wiki-links to other articles. Hope this helps. Danski14 23:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, glad I could help. I looked over the article again, and it's looking better already. I guess he is notable. Danski14 23:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should see the "move" tab up on top, just to the right of "edit". In any case, I moved the page for you. It looks pretty good.. but I think english links might be better, since this is the English wikipedia. One other thing, when you post comments, you can sign your name using four tildas like this ~~~~ and your name and the time will automatically be generated. Danski14 01:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern. I appreciate your good faith in my intentions to be helpful. Sometimes people percieve these nominations as malicious. As I state in my nomination and you were notified above by Danski14 at 23:32, 3 February 2007, you must make the article meet WP:BIO. Wikipedia is neither a primary source nor a secondary source. It is a tertiary source. As such, it has the responsibility to note that various secondary sources have cited primary sources as important. Unfortunately, your grandfather's notability is not heritable. You must cite (secondary) reviews of your fathers (primary) books in this tertiary resource to establish notabiltiy as an author. If you want to establish other types of notability you must provide evidence that satisfies any criteria at WP:BIO. Hope that helps. TonyTheTiger 18:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RS TonyTheTiger 19:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got a chance to look at the deletion discussion. The problem is that the deletions were based on wikipedia policy and the appeals to keep were more emotional. None of them contested the failure of the policies that were pointed out. Instead, they said he is important because I thinks so (sort of). My own bio was AfDed and I believe myself to be one of the nations most prominent martial artists. I know how it goes. TonyTheTiger 20:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Sihaddad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sihaddad.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Use of logo

It doesn't seem like the wikipedia logos are completely free use, but I think it's ok for you to use them on your website. I found this page [1] which says it is ok, as long as you don't change the logos at all. Danski14 17:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== Image:DSC07540.jpg listed for deletion ==

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:DSC07540.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —P ilotguy push to talk 23:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure exactly what you're asking, but to see all of the images you've uploaded, you can take a look at your logs. Hope this helps. —P ilotguy push to talk 15:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing

If you still want to create content, you could create an article with a discovery or some discoveries of your father. Take a look on his books for something interesting. It would still be a way of honouring his work. Mr.K. (talk) 14:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SaadHADDAD.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SaadHADDAD.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Shsundials.jpg

The file File:Shsundials.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Karim Haddad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karim Haddad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ThePorgieBaggins98 (talk) 03:47, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]