User talk:W0lfie

Welcome!

Hello, W0lfie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Boxerglove 04:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Panasonic FZ5

May I ask how you like your Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5? [1] Have you taking any images of animals at maximum zoom? Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I replied on your talk page already, but I guess not. :-) I can send you a couple of sample pictures of an American Goldfinch if you like. What is the best way to contact you? Nevermind I just saw your email address. I'll send the photos there. Cheers! --W0lfie 00:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hrm... I tried your email address listed on your user page, but it bounced back. I'm thinking of uploading the photos to the Commons anyway in case somebody wants another picture of the bird. --W0lfie 14:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

here you go. I cropped out the birdhouse that filled up the rest of the photo (original 2560x1920) --W0lfie 18:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Harp

Thanks, W0lfie. Opus33 18:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Divided Pedal

Re: Split Pedal. I know of two organs in England that have the divided pedal, I imagine there are more, but I can only be certain of Gloucester Cathedral and the Father Wills at Truro Cathedral. The Gloucester Cathedral had the system added in the major overhaul/rebuild in 1999. David Briggs was the organist overseeing both rebuilds, so the device is a favourite of his, no doubt a useful improvisatory tool. Mdcollins1984 09:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ripon Cathedral the system too on its nave console Mdcollins1984 09:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar!

–MDCollins (talk) 22:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stochastic matrix

You seem to have knowledge on how Stochastic matrix works. If you could please get back to me on the talk page of the article, that would be wonderful. Thanks. --Obsolete.fax (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pipe organ FA nomination

Hello… I think Pipe organ is about ready for another FA nomination. I just completed a thorough copyedit, and I was wondering if there was anything else you'd like to change before we proceed to FAC? —Cor anglais 16 23:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PipeOrgan needs you!

Hi everyone.

In case you haven't spotted it, Pipe organ is a featured article candidate. If any of you can lend a hand to address the concerns, the WikiProject PipeOrgan would be indebted to you. The article itself is in pretty good shape, there are some concerns about the referencing at the moment, so if you have any reliable sources that may be useful, please have a look at the article.

Many thanks, –MDCollins (talk) 00:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviving WikiProject PipeOrgan

Hello, W0lfie! I'm attempting to revive Wikipedia:WikiProject PipeOrgan. As you are a member of the project I hope you would like to participate in its revival if you have time. Kind regards, Danmuz (talk) 11:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks back!

I drop by once a month or so and very much appreciated your comment.

The Media Viewer discussion is one of the most painful and saddening that I can recall, and I've been an editor (under various logins as jobs/lifestyles have changed) for most of WP's history. To watch WMF simply archive and ignore a strong, consistent, rational, well-reasoned and well-explained consensus in favour of a Trust-Me-I'm-a-Doctor approach is much like finding out that The Great And Powerful Oz is nothing more than a carnival huckster who couldn't steer his balloon. My first edits were in 2003. Main Page, WYSIWYG, English v English, There Is No Cabal (and it's sudden reversal), even the Jesus Wars and The Great Censorship Campaign -- after a long list of little wars that made me laugh, cry or rant, this is the first that made me seriously doubt the viability of Wiki's core "consensus development" model. We have lost incredible editors each time and I always wondered, "Can't they SEE the bigger picture? Have they forgotten what we're building here?"

Interesting... now that I think of it, I have not made a single edit in several months, not even to correct grammar and spelling errors that I spot (and I'm an unrelenting grammar freak). Wikipedia was (and I'm using the past tense deliberately) the great work of our age, akin to the volunteer-driven OED at the close of the 19th century or the convergence of plate tectonics, meteorology and palaeontology a few decades later -- largely the work of amateurs and dilettantes but destined to change our understanding of our world. Perhaps this is how such efforts always die; those who create are marginalised so "real professionals" can get on with the important work without interference. Maybe those editors of old DID see the bigger picture and, rather late in the day, the penny has finally dropped for me. An interesting thought, and I sincerely hope I'm wrong.Kevin.159.53 (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, W0lfie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, W0lfie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, W0lfie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]