User talk:Vyb5b
Welcome!
[edit]
|
July 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Blenko Glass Company has been reverted.
Your edit here to Blenko Glass Company was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://herald-dispatchblogs04.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
The article Blenko project has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User talk:NawlinWiki. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mo ainm~Talk 15:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:NawlinWiki, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
16:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
damn it, please see the reason. " (issue resolved. Will write an article, get it verified and repost it.)"
thanks 16:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please see WP:UP#CMT: "Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered users, from removing comments from their own talk pages" ... "In general, it is usual to avoid substantially editing another's user and user talk pages" ...
- --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:11, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:NawlinWiki, you may be blocked from editing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Vyb5b (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
The issue is resolved. He/She told me that I need to write an article, get feedback on it, and then it may be reposted. I only deleted the part where I had discussions with him/her. I dont understand why cant you see this? stop spamming my page. FYI: (cur | prev) 16:10, 18 July 2011 Vyb5b (talk | contribs) (18,294 bytes) (NAWLIN HAD DELETED MY PAGE. THE ISSUE IS RESOLVED. I REMOVED ONLY WHAT DISCUSSION I HAD WITH HIM/HER.) (undo)
Vyb5b (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- You are free to blank out discussions on your own talk page - it's up to the other person to decide if/when to blank portions of their own talk page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Vyb5b (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Ok thanks.