User talk:VucoKralj

Crvena zvezda

Actually, no team from Serbia has ever reached the final of a UEFA competition. Crvena zvezda was from Yugoslavia at the time, so that's what we show. – Pee Jay 17:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may think that, but Serbia was not an independent member of UEFA until the breakup of Yugoslavia, so it doesn't make sense to put the Serbian flag next to Crvena zvezda. – Pee Jay 17:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But that club is from Serbia Belgrade now and then. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Socialist_Republic_of_Serbia

Yes, but Serbia wasn't an independent member of UEFA until after Yugoslavia broke up. Your example about England, Wales, etc not being independent nations is stupid too. Those nations are independent members of both UEFA and FIFA and have been since the beginning. That is not the case with Serbia. If you have any more questions, let me know. – Pee Jay 18:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're not making any sense. Of course Serbia is coloured blue, since that's where Red Star is based now – it wouldn't make sense to use an old map just so we could show Yugoslavia as still in existence. Red Star should use the Yugoslavian flag until they reach another final as representatives of Serbia. – Pee Jay 12:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and breaking 3-revert rule (3RR)

Your recent editing history at Yugoslav First League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. That means that you are repeatedly changing important content (ref-notes) back to how you think it should be (you are removing them altogether), without any explanation (WP:FIES; in edit summary or talk page) or attempt to resolve the issue (WP:DR) by attempting to reach a consensus (WP:CONS) on article Talk Page, when you can see that other editor(s) disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--౪ Santa ౪^99° 16:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]