User talk:Voulez768

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because: Minor variation on name of well-known real person. If, after reviewing that policy, you believe your username does not violate policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you can file for a change of username, or you can simply create a new account and start using that one instead. The similarity between this username and the well-known New York stage/screen figure Julie Taymor is conspicuous and unexplained; it is particularly inappropriate to use such a name while editing articles in a manner intend to use Wikipedia to promote an individual based on claims related to the area where the real-world person is notable Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional editing

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Noel Ashman, you will be blocked from editing. Repeatedly adding such unsourced claims to this and to related articles, particularly those naming living individuals, as well as claims contradicted by the sources listed as links or references, also violates Wikipedia content policies. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Speedway Junky, you will be blocked from editing. Adding exaggerated credits, contradicted by cited and reliable sources, which you have done to this and other articles, is a deliberate effort to undermine the accuracy of Wikipedia, and will not be tolerated here. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Mind the Gap, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This account, Voulez768, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy. This block is only regarding your username—it is not a judgment of either you personally or your contributions.

Names should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or related to a "real-world" group or organization. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I have blocked you as you have failed to answer the comment posted above relating to your username. To qualify for an unblock, please give an adequate response to this question. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un|goforit789}}

Hello, I am not sure exactly how to do this since I am new to wikipedia which I have stated to Hullaballoo Wolfowitz in the past. However I do intend to respond to this block since I do feel I have a justified response. First let me start by saying I am only responding to this post now because this is the first time I am seeing it. Again I am new to this site and so I am still learning as I go along. In response to Hullaballoo Wolfowitz's allegations of vandalism among other things, I have to say I have made every effort to try and correct my errors as I am editing. However each time I do and it is deemed unacceptable by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, I have reached out to him for his expertise on his talk wall to be only met by silence. The only responses I saw from him were on the history page of Noel Ashman and each time they were very far from constructive. I asked repeatedly on his talk page what would be the appropriate format, what sources did HE consider reliable enough etc, still I was greeted with silence. It is not been until recently that I have seen other examples that are more appropriately cited on other wikipedia pages that I now understand how to cite properly. Which ironically was all I was looking for from Hullaballoo Wolfowitz during these past few months, a little guidance.

In terms of editing done to Mind the Gap and Speedway Junky, I did not understand the differences in titles when talking about production credits. I have since looked at the Producers Guild of America site and understand it now.

Lastly, in reference to my usage of the username julietamyor, it was never intentional my intention to try and represent someone else. The name is interestingly enough a joke amongst my friends and myself. I would be more than happy to change it to something else unrelated.

I hope that has cleared up some issues and I am happy to bring this issue to light because I am finally getting some real answers. Thank you for your time.

Julietamyor (talk) 18:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Please visit WP:CHU immediately.

Request handled by: –xeno^talk 13:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Nomination of Noel Ashman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noel Ashman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel Ashman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 23:13, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Noel Ashman

A tag has been placed on Noel Ashman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]