User talk:Vothlee

Start here

Vothlee, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vothlee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Daniel Oerther was accepted

Daniel Oerther, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Coin945 (talk) 06:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajiv Khosla

Hello Vothlee,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rajiv Khosla for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Avgr8 (talk) 22:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Stephen Battersby

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Vothlee, thanks for creating Stephen Battersby!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. mNotable (MBE) but More sources required

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to avoid this page being listed for deletion, please add more sources in order to comply with the requirements at WP:BLP; Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Groenwald moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Susan Groenwald, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Business Wire is not considered a reliable source for establishing notability, as it largely consists of archived press releases, which are not independent. Meanwhile, the Chicago Tribune and Bloomberg citations do not discuss Groenwald in sufficient depth.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some additional references and put it back in mainspace. Feel free to use those references to continue to expand the article. Thanks for writing it! Brad v 02:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Davidson (disambiguation)

Hi. I've reviewed Patricia Davidson (disambiguation). Do note the {{One other topic}} tag and try to address it. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

nursing

I've been urging people for years to do more biographies of people in nursing. I'm delighted to see that you are working on them. I have made some edits to some of the articles you have been working on, mostly by omitting minor material. For distinguished people, such content just detracts rom the importance. If you need any help , jsut ask on my talk page. DGG ( talk ) 03:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

However, pictures of someone receiving an award are usually seen as promotional, unless there is no other free picture of the person available. We do have many in WP, but they are gradually being removed. DGG ( talk ) 01:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thx!Vothlee (talk) 02:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Vothlee[reply]

I and another editor have also removed inappropriate puffery and excessive claims from an article on Daniel Oerther. Some of it seems to have been restored, and I have started removing again; there is also other material there that needs shortening as well. Please re-read my comment on minor material above. DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Following your example, additional material pruned. Thx! Vothlee (talk) 23:02, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vothlee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Convergence research moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Convergence research, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears to be essentially original research and WP:SYNTHESIS You need to show the actual use of the term in major reliable sources. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Convergence research

Hello, Vothlee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Convergence research, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]