User talk:Vortex Shedding

Hello, Vortex Shedding! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!

উইকিপিডিয়ায় আপনাকে স্বাগতম। উইকিসম্পাদনার জন্য প্রয়োজনীয় নিয়মগুলোর লিংক নিচে যুক্ত করা হল। এর পরেও কোন সাহায্য প্রয়োজন হলে আমার আলাপ পাতায় জানাতে পারেন। সাধ্যমত সাহায্যের চেষ্ট করবো। ধন্যবাদ --Freemesm (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

File source problem with File:Ayyaswamy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ayyaswamy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 09:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image file was originally taken from Dr. Ayyaswamy's official website : http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~ayya/. But, now I have uploaded a better resolution image for his profile picture. The file name is "Professor_Ayyaswamy.jpg". This picture is given to me by Professor Ayyaswamy.Pratanu.roy (talk) 07:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Professor Ayyaswamy.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Professor Ayyaswamy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 13:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me of this issue. I will soon add the necessary source and reference for this image. Can you please check the article and let me know if it looks like an encyclopedic article now and is it possible to remove the notes regarding 3rd party references at the top of the article? I have added about 30 references.Pratanu.roy (talk) 09:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My error in saving a change

I think we were editing at the same time, my edit looks like it was saved twice. Did I delete your material? If so, it was an honest mistake and I apologize.Crtew (talk) 16:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. It seems like our edits have overlapped. I apologize if I have removed any of your edits. Thanks. Pratanu.roy (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing fine! I'm sure the problem was mine. Happy editing, Crtew (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet

You asked how one reports a sockpuppet, I do this quite often. Who do you think is socking and who the socks are? Darkness Shines (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, I don't have any sockpuppet complain against any specific user. I just wanted to know the process how to report it since I am working on some current articles in Wikipedia, which are frequently vandalized by some editors of a certain group. Thanks for your concern, btw. Pratanu.roy (talk) 22:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly revert

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. You have been reverting the edits and redirecting the article 2013 Bangladesh riot before finishing the discussion. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You have been reported for 3RR violations. Please see WP:3RR. Thanks. --Rossi101 (talk) 09:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Rossi101[reply]

You just copy pasted my warning, or what? And, did you actually report me for 3RR violations (although you can not prove that even if you do so). Anyway, thanks for the warning! Pratanu.roy (talk) 09:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Title

We can start a discussion on the title on the article talk page. You can start it right away. I'll be posting it shortly anyways. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 06:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there is already a thread named 'Changing the title' in the talk page. Thanks. 165.91.192.142 (talk) 07:26, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That thread has become too convoluted already. So I started a new one. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 09:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1971 Bangladesh atrocities

You recently commented on a RM on the article 1971 Bangladesh atrocities. The discussion was closed and the article moved to the previous title by another editor per WP:RM/TR. A new RM has been initiated and can be found here Darkness Shines (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have put my comments there. Thanks for letting me know. Vortex Shedding (talk) 05:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look on Mahmudur Rahman

I think you are from Bangladesh. Could you please provide some input on this article? A discussion is going on Talk:Mahmudur Rahman page. Can you please take part there?--FreemesM ^(talk) 17:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a look at it. Thanks. Vortex Shedding (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

"Users who repeatedly restore the same comment to another user's talk page may be blocked for violating the three-revert rule or harassing another user, regardless of whether the talk page is for a registered editor or for an unregistered "anonymous" editor."

I am perfectly in my rights to remove absurd edit war warning notices from users who are edit warring against me. You are not within your rights to repeatedly restore content on my talk page. This is a terse but polite message to warn you to refrain from doing so in future. Applesandapples (talk) 07:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will remove your warning using my 'rights' shortly. :) Vortex Shedding (talk) 20:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N. K. Anand (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:N. K. Anand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:N. K. Anand, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vortex Shedding! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KartikeyaS (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:N. K. Anand

Hello, Vortex Shedding. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:N. K. Anand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:N. K. Anand

Hello, Vortex Shedding. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "N. K. Anand".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]