User talk:Vonones

Armenian-Georgian relations & Georgian-Armenian War 1918

Hi Vonones. I removed the passage to retain a NPOV text but posted it on talk. Thanks for your understanding, --Kober^Talk 07:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turks

Hi Vonones, Do you know or intended to learn what was done to turks between 1821 and 1922??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Birisi (talk • contribs) 21:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Armenians

I just didn't know what was going on, so I did what my mom told me to say when I don't understand what the Mexican kids are talking about....--Skatewalk 15:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC) I know/hope you are not Mexican, because I will be really pissed off if you are a Mexican guy editing Lebanese articles!--Skatewalk 15:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Man it was a joke! Are you Aremnian or Polish!!--Skatewalk 05:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Christopher Jon Bjerkness

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Christopher Jon Bjerkness, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Christopher Jon Bjerkness is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Christopher Jon Bjerkness, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I saw [1]. Thanks a lot. That guy has been doing that for weeks. I tried ANI twice - the first time resulted in semi-protect, the 2nd time a "content dispute" dismissal. Hopefully your report will work - that guy shows no willingness to work collaboratively at all. Many thanks again. The Behnam 01:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

It is pretty pointless reporting laertes' editing problems to me, if you are then going to gbreak 3RR yourself (as you did on Erzurum). The next time you revert more than 3 times I will block you. ELIMINATORJR 17:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More of a content dispute over a paragraph, but its best just to report to WP:AIV if it's vandalism. ELIMINATORJR 19:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sumer

According to Carleton Coon the Sumerians were "white men of the Mediterranean race" and resembled Englishmen. I added this information but an editor reverted to the old version. I noticed that you had edited the article so what do you think?MoritzB 19:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 7 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Attacotti tribe, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 16:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ishkhan Zakaryan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ishkhan Zakaryan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Doc^g 21:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Şule Kut

An editor has nominated Şule Kut, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Şule Kut and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Greywolfyouth.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Greywolfyouth.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TwoMightyGods^Persuasion_Necessity 16:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC) --TwoMightyGods^Persuasion_Necessity 16:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Wheelbarol.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wheelbarol.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TwoMightyGods^Persuasion_Necessity 16:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC) --TwoMightyGods^Persuasion_Necessity 16:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Assyriandemon.PNG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Assyriandemon.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TwoMightyGods^Persuasion_Necessity 16:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC) --TwoMightyGods^Persuasion_Necessity 16:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:BakoSaa.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:BakoSaa.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -Nard 21:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Lachishsiege1.PNG

File:Lachishsiege1.PNG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Lachishsiege1.PNG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Lachishsiege1.PNG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Vonones! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 259 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Gor Mkhitarian - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nikoghos Tahmizian - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kevork Aslan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Kirakosyan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nikoghos Tahmizian

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nikoghos Tahmizian. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikoghos Tahmizian. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shattak River

The article Shattak River has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

poorly identified river, not appearing on List of tributaries of the Tigris, content is just a clip from a nineteenth century periodical.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anouschka Izmirlian

The article Anouschka Izmirlian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a non-notable person created by a blocked sockpuppet

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 20:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mediamax news agency

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mediamax news agency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mach61 (talk) 14:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]