Jump to content

User talk:VolleyFan101

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, VolleyFan101, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 21:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about David Kisiel

[edit]

Hello, VolleyFan101, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username GeoffreyT2000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, David Kisiel, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kisiel.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GeoffreyT2000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GeoffreyT2000:
Hello and nice to meet you! I left a reply on the discussion. I do think I could restructure and improve the article in that sense, but I believe the article is suitable and meets the WP:NBASIC standards based on the reliability of the sources. I've written many articles in the past few years and think this article topic is valid and encyclopedic. Would you be able to elaborate on why the sources aren't meeting Wikipedia standards in this situation? Thanks!
~~~~ VolleyFan101 (talk) 09:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 23:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Kisiel moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, David Kisiel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]