User talk:Volkstod

Hallo World

Volkstod, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Volkstod!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:21, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed

Hello, can you please add sources to Björn Höcke? I can't because I don't speak or read German. Thank you. (See also: Wikipedia:Verifiability) 12.180.133.18 (talk) 13:43, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Scanner Darkly (film)

added a link pointing to Alex Jones

Pranas Dovydaitis

added a link pointing to Occupation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Hayden (general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Konkret, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Kurz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ljubisav Đokić

Dear sir, you've removed cited material, relevant to the personal opinion of the person to whom this article is dedicated.

With kind regards,

M — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.149.232.157 (talk) 14:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

English

Hello Volkstod,

while Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and everyone is invited to contribute, you are expected to have at least a certain level of language proficiency. Excuse me for putting it very bluntly, but your English is too bad. Some of your contributions appear as if they were simply translated via Google translator (or a similar translation program). You probably know that they are not accurate. Some of your texts are practically unintelligible. English is not my native language either and I am aware that I make some mistakes. But my contributions are usually accepted, with native speakers correcting some minor grammatical or spelling mistakes. Your edits however are nearly impossible to correct, because it is so hard to even understand what you are trying to express. If you want to continue contributing to English Wikipedia, you have to make a greater effort into producing (more) correct English. Else I would advise you to contribute to your native language version.

Also, I would like to draw your attention to WP:Verifiability which is one of the core policies of Wikipedia. All non-trivial additions or changes in content have to be backed by reliable sources, preferably by inserting footnotes using the <ref>...</ref> code (you will find more detailed instructions at WP:Citing sources, Help:Footnotes or Help:Referencing for beginners). Simply adding numbers in square brackets that are not clickable and do not reference anything, is pointless. Also, if you translate texts from other language versions of Wikipedia, please at least make a note in the edit summary. While Wikipedia is not protected by copyright, you are expected to always attribute your sources, especially if the text is not authored by yourself and you are just the translator.

Thanks for your understanding. Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Henriette Reker

Hi Volkstod,
I'm wondering why in the article Henriette Reker you removed the word "xenophobic" the second time, though it is found in the original citation. I even doubt, the word "antimigrational" even exists.
Regards, PanchoS (talk) 21:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Hero Group. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Katja Ebstein, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Sanders

Hey, I saw you undid a change by User:Wukai here. I fail to see the rationale behind this; I do believe that Wukai's edit improved the article by both making the text easier to read and removing qualifying adjectives that could be seen as biased. May you please explain your rationale? Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 08:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Umvolkung" again

Hello,

please stop [1] this nonsense. There is absolutely no mention of "Umvolkung" or anything the like in the referenced article. Wikipedia is not the place to spread ridiculous far-right conspiracy theories. Regards, --RJFF (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rzeczpospolita (newspaper) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Christian Rehm seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boomer Vial (talk) 03:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Volkstod. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- 84.59.84.9 (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Point of View

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please stop adding anti asylum, non sourced, non neutral POV stuff to random articles about [newspapers] or [left wing politicians] (using right wing slang "Umvolkung") etc. LucLeTruc (talk) 02:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Jürgen Elsässer. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship and reverting

Please do not remove information from articles. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Dear volkstod. I reverted your removal of relevant material from the André Poggenburg article for good reasons. The content that you removed contained relevant information about a well referenced episode of this politicians life and has been subject to a significant media debate. Please do not simply revert again using the same arguments that you used to delete the content but discuss this on the discussion page. LucLeTruc (talk) 23:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring and censoring referenced content

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Volkstod, please stop immdediatly censoring (i.e. deleting) well referenced and meaningful content and engaging into edit wars with other users without discussing the issue on the relevant discussion page. This refers to your recent reverts on the page Hans Köchler and several other deletions on other pages (see coments above). Best regards LucLeTruc (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Volkstod, I have contacted you several times and told you how to properly handle disputes over contestet content without engaging in edit wars. Your behaviour has not changed, so I had to post your behaviour on the admin notice board. LucLeTruc (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 19:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are obviously here purely for the purpose of pushing an extremist political point of view, and you have ignored all warnings. Bishonen | talk 19:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Volkstod. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]