User talk:Vokkare
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Vokkare, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Aboutmovies (talk) 05:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Vokkare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have seriously no idea of where that comes from, I am not ldmrks1, and have never heard about him. I also looked, and his last edit was a minor edit on December 31, which is more than 2 months old, maybe I made an account back them to make a minor edit (which I seriously doubt about), but in no case I "abused" from multiple accounts.
Decline reason:
You most certainly have, as checkuser shows a rather long list of accounts belonging to you. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vokkare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'll only ask one question. If we forget those which were created today, how many of them have more than two edits? I've never used multiple accounts to my advantage, sometimes I simply created a new account to make an edit, anonymously, but I've never abused of them. My only main account was Vokkare, Kingway is my wife's account and Delblow is my son's. The rest were simply random accounts with no history to make a little contribution now and then. My ban reason clearly claim an abuse, which I completly deny. My accounts were never used to my advantage, and I've made no abuse with them.
Decline reason:
I don't see anything that meets the valid usage under WP:Alternate account, and lots that violate WP:SOCK. And then, of course, lying about it? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vokkare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Facts are facts ; the reason cited states an abuse, which I have not made. There was no abuse, whether or not it violates the policy, the reason is not valid. You didn't answer my point. And why do you accuse me of lying? When did I lie? Please back up your statements, otherwise, they aren't valid. I refuse this explaination.
Decline reason:
I see numerous accounts, all dedicated to declaring that such-and-such actress has ADHD. Using multiple accounts to feign consensus is an abuse of the rules. TNXMan 14:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi. I think the use of the term "abuse" here was unfortunate, and I'm pretty sure it wasn't used to mean you were personally being abusive. All it really means is that your multiple accounts are not in keeping with recognised valid usage as described at WP:Alternate account, and so in that sense they're an "abuse" of the rules - albeit, I'm sure, accidental. I also don't think "in no case I "abused" from multiple accounts" should be called a lie, as I think it was just two people understanding the term "abuse" differently. I'd urge people to try not to use emotive language like "lying" and "abuse", and instead stick with more neutral terms that are less likely to offend or be misunderstood by a relatively inexperienced editor -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Vokkare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Now, if I tell you that I won't use double accounts anymore now that I am aware of it, is there any way that I could be unbanned? I would rather have this one unbanned than ldmskv1, which I don't understand why it is supposed to be my main. Or simply have the autorization to create a new one, unique, and not use any other anymore? I want to contribute to Wikipedia. It is said in the Wikipedia page about appealing blocks that blocks are mostly warnings and that if a user understands his faults, he could be unbanned. I would like to have this right, I would like you to let me a chance. Thank you.
Decline reason:
I don't think so. You've created well over a dozen accounts, and you've done really unpleasant things like vandalizing with one and then proudly reverting part of the vandalism with another (all in keeping with your continual efforts to label various actors as having ADHD). I don't see how any of your accounts have been particularly beneficial to Wikipedia. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:16, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vokkare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm not asking you to review my past, I'm asking you to let me a chance. Every information concerning ADHD, by the way, was sourced. The vandalism only happenned once, and I apologize. If I can't get a chance, this means that I will be banned forever? At my first infraction? I'm asking a chance to prove that I can really contribute, and if I do anything wrong again, then ban me again. I think, in my sense, that I should have the right to this chance, as said in http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks . And to say that I've never contributed to Wikipedia is mean, seriously.
Decline reason:
I regret to inform you that because you have continually posted unblock requests which pretty much reiterate the same argument, a practice which can be described as admin shopping, I have decided to revoke your talk page access so admins can devote more time and effort to reviewing the unblock requests where the user might have something to say that we haven't heard before. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.