User talk:Voiceofreason467

Welcome!

Hello, Voiceofreason467, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --OpenFuture (talk) 07:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip and I do know that, it's just that sometimes I get tired or forget to use the feature.Reason and Logic shall always prevail (talk) 21:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reinventor098

I have noticed that your edits are somewhat similar to those of another user, Reinventor098 (talk · contribs). Are you by any chance connected? If so, please review Wikipedia:Sock puppetry which states that "The general rule is one editor, one account". Cusop Dingle (talk) 20:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No we are not connected in any way Dingle, I would imagine with so many users on wikipedia that you are bound to come up to two users who edit in a similar fashion on the same topic.Reason and Logic shall always prevail (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that assurance. Cusop Dingle (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Repeated false accusations of 'vandalism' etc at The Zeitgeist Movement article. Thank you. Cusop Dingle (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is needed in this discussion on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie

Hi. Two editors are advocating for the exclusion of any mention in the Zeitgeist: The Movie article that Peter Joseph, the creator of that film has stated publicly that words attributed to him in a story cited as a source in the article misquoted him, and that he has not distanced himself from the ideas expressed in that film, as that cited source indicates. I have responded to their arguments, but neither of them has responded directly to my counterarguments, but simply repeat the same statements of theirs over and over. Myself and one other editor disagree with them, so two editors are for the material's inclusion, and two are for its exclusion, with no sign of consensus in sight. Can you please offer your viewpoint in the discussion so that we can achieve consensus? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize but I am unable to help you in this endeavor as I am not familar with the Wikipedia policy in establishing this.Reason and Logic shall always prevail (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my earlier edit and decided to take a look at it, I will throw in my support as your's and the three other editor's that also support your position have convinced me to include it in the topic.Reason and Logic shall always prevail (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]