User talk:Vnisanian2001

Caption1
Caption2

2

Fair use rationale for File:BagdasarianFilmCorporation.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianFilmCorporation.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BagdasarianFilmCorporationBW.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianFilmCorporationBW.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BagdasarianProductions1984.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianProductions1984.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 06:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BagdasarianProductions1984-1987.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianProductions1984-1987.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BagdasarianMovie1987.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianMovie1987.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 06:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 06:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BagdasarianSyndication.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianSyndication.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BagdasarianDiC.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianDiC.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bagdasarian1989.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bagdasarian1989.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Big Spin

Hi. Can you clarify your edit of 1 February 2009 to The Big Spin? Please see my comment at Talk:The_Big_Spin#Edit_by_Vnisanian2001. Thanks, --LottsoLuck (talk) 07:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Megaman2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Megaman2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:MrBelvedere1985.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:MrBelvedere1985.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Bagdasarian611.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bagdasarian611.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:BagdasarianProductions1981.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianProductions1981.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:BagdasarianProductions1983.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BagdasarianProductions1983.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for restoring the list of DVD's section to Alvin and the Chipmunks. And it's perfectly safe to keep it up, since that troll is blocked for an entire year. WikiLubber (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Warren Beatty, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 05:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page List of transgender people appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 06:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Family Feud. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 22:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Sale of the Century (U.S. game show), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 00:50, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

edit 1

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Sale of the Century (U.S. game show). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 01:18, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

edit 2

December 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Press Your Luck. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please remember that when including links to references, these references must meet WP:VERIFY. Links to a fan-created website ([1], [2] and [3]) are not acceptable sources. Also, your link to Youtube pointing to a user-submitted video that violates copyright protection does not fall under the guidelines of an acceptable addition per WP:YOUTUBE. Sottolacqua (talk) 12:32, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Press Your Luck. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. [4]. Also, new messages on a talk page go at the bottom of the page, and please remember to sign your posts. Sottolacqua (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trash-O-Madness

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Trash-O-Madness, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Trash -O- Madness. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 22:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vnisanian2001, I saw what happened here, and what you should have done was perform a page move, rather than copy and past it yourself. Since you were the only contributor, other than a bot, it's not a big deal, but if other editors had contributed to the original article, it could have been an issue. If you need any help with this on the future, just let me know, and I will try to help. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mr. Belvedere episodes

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "List of Mr. Belvedere episodes". Thank you. --George Ho (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You must respond at WP:DRN#List of Mr. Belvedere episodes, not my talk page or yours. --George Ho (talk) 06:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DRN message is closed as premature, yet I don't think you can change your mind about general readers. Do you have to force readers to accept the production order arrangement and such details that are less interesting and irrelevant to the topic? Let's talk more at Talk:list of Mr. Belvedere episodes. --George Ho (talk) 18:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joel Gilbert for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Gilbert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Gilbert (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Holiday Cheer

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt ^talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

By the way, I missed the original AFD and have no idea know what the original version looked like last May.... but issues were addressable, and it has been going through some major improvements,[5] so I wanted to thank you for bringing Joel Gilbert back to article space to serve the project. Well done. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Gilbert (2nd nomination)

I can understand the nominator sending your 1084 characters (183 words) unsourced stub to AFD.[6] However, since you first commented, I did a little research on the topic and edited the article. We now have a 5832 characters (956 words) start or C class article of someone shown to meet WP:CREATIVE. So far... a 5x expansion.[7] Perhaps you might revisit the discussion? Merry Christmas. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm AldezD. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Press Your Luck because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! [8]. Please do not add unreferenced material to articles. AldezD (talk) 12:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not introduce deliberate factual errors as you did in these edits. The program premiered in 1983. AldezD (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What you "heard from a former staff member on the show" does not meet WP:V. As to Sale of the Century, the year production began is not the same as when the show aired. AldezD (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Press Your Luck, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. [9] AldezD (talk) 21:10, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please review guidelines at WP:ECITE and avoid adding raw links for references as you did in this edit. AldezD (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information to articles or any other page on Wikipedia, as you did to Sale of the Century (U.S. game show). Thank you. Please do not re-add unreferenced material back to this article as you did in multiple recent edits. AldezD (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:AldezD. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [10] AldezD (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talksback/Sale of the Century

Per WP:V, you need to provide appropriate sources when available when making contributions. AldezD (talk) 19:54, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finders Keepers (game show) and references

Please be sure to provide references or add a Template:CN tag to information you are introducing to articles. Your recent edit to Finders Keepers (game show) added a table and introduced a production end date of July 29, 1988 that did not match the date of September 11, 1988 in the third sentence of the first paragraph of the Finders Keepers (game show)#Broadcast history section. I changed the sentence in Broadcast history, but if you have a source please add it. AldezD (talk) 12:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Vnisanian2001. You have new messages at AldezD's talk page.
Message added 12:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Also, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. AldezD (talk) 12:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Double Dare (1986 game show). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [11] Please include sources when making edits to articles. AldezD (talk) 12:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Double Dare (1986 game show). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Please be sure to add references when making edits such as these. AldezD (talk) 14:29, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with WP:CITE and Template:Cite web. You need to do more than just post a raw link as a reference. For the YouTube video you added in this edit, use the fields in Template:Cite web to add quotations that provide details contained within the video interview. AldezD (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Double Dare (1986 game show), you may be blocked from editing. Please add sources when you make edits. [12] AldezD (talk) 20:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Double Dare (1986 game show), you may be blocked from editing. [13] AldezD (talk) 00:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Make the Grade, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. [14] AldezD (talk) 04:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Repeated addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at USA Up All Night, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [15] You were recently blocked for similar behavior in making edits without providing sources. Please do not do this again. AldezD (talk) 17:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at USA Up All Night, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding unreferenced information to articles. AldezD (talk) 17:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:AldezD. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [16] AldezD (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing, including repeatedly adding dubious unsourced content to articles, at least some of that content being demonstrably false, and also making personal attacks on another editor. Considering that you have been receiving messages about the same kind of unsourced editing for a period of more than two years, you have been lucky to keep going this long with only one very short block. Please reconsider the way you edit when the block expires. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citing IMDb

Regarding your recent edits, [17] please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing IMDb when attempting to use the website as a reference. Specifically, "Anecdotes, trivia, and unreleased film information from IMDb do not meet the reliable sources guideline. The IMDb should only be used as a tertiary source for "hard data" on released films." AldezD (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Hot Seat (talk show), you may be blocked from editing. revision as of 20:03, October 12, 2013. Please stop adding information to articles without providing the necessary backup per WP:V. AldezD (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Hot Seat (talk show). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You have been repeatedly warned about making unreferenced changes to articles. Please do not make edits such as this without providing the necessary backup. AldezD (talk) 18:10, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wipeout (1988 U.S. game show), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [18]. You have been blocked for this behavior multiple times. Please stop adding information without including the necessary references. AldezD (talk) 23:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 03:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:AldezD, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. [19] AldezD (talk) 17:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at List of Mama's Family episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [20] AldezD (talk) 03:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bad (Michael Jackson song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reference associated with the earlier edit mentions 1987. Reference showing 1987/your edit. AldezD (talk) 17:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 18:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Vnisanian2001. You have new messages at Talk:Bad (Michael Jackson song).
Message added 19:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AldezD (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mkdw ^talk 21:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes: You have been blocked for a period of 3 months under WP:DISRUPTSIGNS #2: Cannot satisfy Wikipedia:Verifiability; fails to cite sources, cites unencyclopedic sources, misrepresents reliable sources, or manufactures original research. Three WP:ANI (1, 2, & 3) have been filed against you in the past 4 months. Additionally, concerns about WP:COMPETENCE and WP:CONCENSUS have been brought forth to your attention and not responded to. You have been blocked twice before and after this block expires any further indiscretions will likely lead to an indefinite block. Mkdw ^talk 21:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 01:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi, Vnisanian. Your three-month block mentoned above expired only recently, and it's apparent that you have returned to disruptive editing. See this ANI thread. I'm afraid I have blocked you indefinitely, just as Mkdw warned you might happen. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 23:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]