User talk:Vladovivoda

Welcome!

Hello, Vladovivoda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  -- WikHead (talk) 07:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Smile!

A smile for you You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.0.137 (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello Vladovivoda, I just wanted to welcome you and tell you that I am very glad that you created some articles which were missing here on Wikipedia. I will like to invite you to become member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football (you can add yourself here). I completed and wikified some of the articles you created: Boško Bursać, Vladimir Lukarić, Sergio Machin, Anđelo Milevoj and Milan Radović. Just so you would know, I changed some places because we agreed at WP:Football to use allways the place of birth in the form of city+country using the names at time of birth. Also, the names at the defaultsort don´t use diacritics as that is how English defaultsorting works and if left with diacritics it wan´t read them correctly then. I added the categories as well, and I completed the careers where it was possible. Wikipedia supports that, when possible, we use more than one source, so usualy it is good to have at least two or three. Generaly, the one which is usualy usefull for Yugoslav First League players is Playerhistory as it is among the generalistic football websites the one that has more players from that period. The Reprezentacija.rs is widely used among editors from former Yugoslavia because it has biographies and basic info of all Yugoslav internationals. For players which were not internationals, there was a site zerodic.com which had a complete list of all first and second Yugoslav league players with their stats from 1974 to 1991, however that list is not available on the website anymore, so we are only left with a copy of the data in B92 forum: ordered alphabeticaly by surnames A-E, F-O and P-Ž. Forums are obviously not considered to be a reliable source, but this specific one has been accepted as it is a copy of the refered webiste which had originaly copied the data from the old Yugoslav League almanah´s. If you ever need I gathered some usefull websites at User:FkpCascais/Sandbox17 and if you want you can please feel free to add more links that may be helpfull for us, I will be extremely greatefull. Anyway, I am just glad that more productive editors like you appear to help creating and expanding articles about football from Croatia and the Yugoslav league´s, please feel free to ask me for help if you ever need. I supose you are a Rijeka supporter, so it may also be that I may need your help for some articles. Also, any questions you can always ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football where all the major issues about football at Wikipedia are discussed. Congatulations for the articles you created and best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 03:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello FkpCascais. Thank you for your kind welcoming words and for your support. The websites you suggest for future use are very useful. In fact, I consulted reprezentacija.rs before but did not cite it. I've also looked at data from the b92 forum when adding Rijeka scorers in Adriatic derby cup games. I definitely look forward to further contributions and will make sure I cite at least two documents when creating a new page. Please let me know should you require any help with Croatian and Yugoslav entries as I have a lot of info. For instance, I own an old Yugoslav almanac (1978-1986) which can be very useful for player specific data. In terms of Rijeka, I can definitely be of help as I have a book that documents the club's history along with all of the player and game info. In fact, I've decided to add some player entries because some legends of the club did not have one. My plan is to add quite a few more and I will follow your suggestions when I do it. Besides adding all the pre-1992 seasons in the list of HNK Rijeka seasons (which I did a while ago), I would also like to add a game-by-game break down for each season for Rijeka, which would take a bit of work. The only problem is that I am not in Croatia (but in Australia) and can't access newspapers archives for some past periods (I wish I could!), and they've only digitalised them for the past ten years or so. I've encountered issues with finding data I wanted a number of times and short of having full access to newspapers archives it is nigh on impossible for someone 10,000 miles away. Anyway, I've added myself to WikiProject Football and please let me know if I can be of any help. Best wishes, Vladovivoda 23:30, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Vlado. Just to let you know that I didn´t forgot you, just that everything has been going so fine so I didn´t intended to interump you. :) I actualy noteced some time ago that many Rijeka players were missing but I never menaged time to make their articles, so that is why I was glad to see you did some of them. Regarding the issue of access of newspapers archives, I live in Lisbon in Portugal, but if you want I can see if I can access some for you and copy/paste them if you want... FkpCascais (talk) 04:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey, can I ask you something? I suppose you follow soccer in Australia, if not, I apologise for making assumptions, but I just wanted to see what can you tell me about Eli Babalj? Is he good? Will he addapt well in Europe if he eventually comes? FkpCascais (talk) 03:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

football infobox

FYI... You are using an out of date infobox for footballer. Please use Template:Infobox football biography. Also use the {{birth date and age}} template when doing birth_date in the infobox Bgwhite (talk) 06:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Rijeka - Famous Players

Hi Vladivoda, I have added back the famous tag you removed due to major concerns over the relevance and objectivity of the criteria and the fact that the list is far far too long. I have the following concerns about the criteria:

• Played at least 100 league games for the club - This is fine, as it would require a significant number of seasons to achieve, but should be balanced by consideration of the number of players who could achieve it. If it is many then the required games should be increased as the longer a list, the less notable any given player on it is by definition.
• Scored at least 20 league goals for the club - this is not a good inclusion criterion as it could be accomplished in one season.
• Topped the club's goalscoring chart in any season - this is an even worse criterion as in a particularly poor season, the top scorer may only achieve a handful of goals
• Played at least one international match for their national team (not necessarily while playing for Rijeka) - this is also a poor criterion, why should a player who was capped at another club but not a Rijeka be notable for Rijeka when he achieved nothing on the international scene while at Rijeka? If anything it indicates that his worth to the national team went down.
• Played at least ten league games for the club when they were league runner-ups (1998–99 and 2005–06) - another poor criterion, firstly, ten games, which could be all a player ever played for the club is not very much, secondly it is an arbitrary decision and thirdly, they did not actually win the league so I am unsure why this makes them particularly notable.
• Played in at least one of the club's 10 national cup final matches - Another poor criterion which requires a player to only actually play in one game to appear on this list
• Played in one of the six historic European matches against Juventus, Real Madrid and Stuttgart - not an acceptable criterion at all, who is saying these are historic matches? It is OR to make such a claim and again requires a player to only make one appearance for the club to qualify for inclusion.

I also have a major, wider, concern about the length of the list, it is far far too long for such a section. The number of players on it inherently indicates that they are not actually that notable. Given that there are already two sourced listings for all-time XIs, what is the need for this huge list anyway? Please don't remove the tag without addressing these concerns. My view is that this listing should be removed entirely. It is a considerable piece of work and I do not wish to rile anyone, so if my concerns aren't addressed, then I propose the issue be taken to WT:FOOTY to gain consensus. Fenix down (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Fenix down, and thank you for your feedback. This "notable players" list has been giving me a headache for quite a while, so I really appreciate your feedback. I would be happy for this list to be removed entirely as there is an all-time XIs plus an existing category with all the players that have played for Rijeka. I devised the set of criteria that you engage above after bringing up the issue in Rijeka supporters' forum, and simply followed up on suggestions by other fans. What I suggest is that I shorten the list considerably by including only those players who satisfy ALL of the following criteria:

• Played at least 100 league games for the club;
• Scored at least 20 league goals for the club if forward, 10 if midfielder and no goal requirement if defender or goalkeeper; and
• Played at least one international match for their national team while playing for Rijeka.
• Otherwise, also included are ten of the historical league top scorers and ten most capped Rijeka players.

Do you think this would be ok? I may have a crack at it, and if you are still not satisfied please feel free to remove the list all together. Best, Vlado

Hi Vlado, I think the list looks fine now. As long as the list stays around its current length I don't think that it is too intrusive. Also by ensuring that players have to fulfil all criteria it will be easy to check other articles to ensure they fulfil them. Thanks for sorting that out. Fenix down (talk) 07:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Derby Rijeka vs Dinamo

If you can do make an article on that rivalry of Rijeka and Dinamo. In advance thankful. Jolicnikola (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. It is the next on my to-do list so I will get it done over the next few weeks. I have most of the info that is required.

Links to Transfermarkt

The Transfermarkt website contains user-generated contributions and as such is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. The template was deleted last year due to this reason. See also here. Please do not add Transfermarkt links back into Wikipedia articles. Thanks, C679 21:12, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

What website am I supposed to cite then for player transfers other than Transfermarkt?

If the data is only on Transfermarkt, it is original research. Any reliable information should exist in other places. See similar articles if you need inspiration. C679 05:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

re: 2014-15 Europa League

Hi, please see the talkpage of the article, the difference is that UEFA has also given tromsö 1,5 points for eliminated in play-off, which they actually were before being re-admitted. It is all interpretation of the rules and we have to go by UEFA there since they make the rules and the seeding and they released officiall acccess-list today with the high Tromsö coeficient. QED237 (talk) 00:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I totally disagree with UEFA and what they've done in this case, but you're right, they're the ones who make the rules.Vladovivoda (talk) 01:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Coat of arms of Rijeka.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Rijeka.svg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Foreigners

Hello Vlado, hope everything is fine with you and you had nice Christmas and holydays. I just want to tell you that at the foreigners list I removed Devescovi from Austria because he is born in Rovinj and was Yugoslav/Croatian player that never played for any national team. He later played in Austria and got Austrian citizenship and that is why some websites put him as Austrian. But he is Croatian. The only Yugoslavs added to the list are the ones that played for other national teams. Also, Zijler is under Suriname because he played for Suriname national team. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 14:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Croatian football league

Hi, I saw that you have been updating 2015–16 HNK Rijeka season and I want to know if you know the classification rules for the league table (anything that can be used as source). Currently it has been saying head-to-head record if teams have same points but all I can find is this from scoresway saying goal difference. I have tried looking at the league official page but it did not work very well because I dont speak croatian. Do you know the classification rules, and perhaps has a source for it? Qed237 (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Qed237: Hey, thanks for the question. It is goal difference during the season but head-to-head record in the final table only, right at the end of the season. The sources would be the rules published somewhere on www.hns-cff.hr or www.prvahnl.hr, but I will have to confirm. (talk) 01:38, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the information. I tried looking at those pages (with help from google translate), but could not find it. Qed237 (talk) 01:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

If you can find anything, please let me know (no rush and only if you want to). Would be good to source it in the article/table. Qed237 (talk) 01:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

@Qed237: No worries. Here we go - article 42, pages 8-9, it is stated that final ranking is decided based on head-to-head record if it is to decide the league winner, European spots or relegation. Otherwise, goal difference is used: Competition rules.(talk) 10:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Okay, thank you very much. I will add this information below the league table. Very interesting system (a bit weird according to me) to order some teams by goal differential and the others by head-to-head. Why not order all after head-to-head? But anyway that is the rules, we just follow them. Once again, thank you! Qed237 (talk) 13:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Feel free to look at Template:2015–16 Croatian First Football League table to see if it is correct. I made the changes with google translate so there might be one or two mistakes. Qed237 (talk) 13:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vladovivoda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Template

Hello! I really like Template:Rijeka which you created and modeled, so I wonder would you be interested to create and model Template:Zadar in the same way. I'm looking forward to hear what you think on this. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 22:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Updating Hajduk's season article

Do you can to update the Hajduk's season article (2016–17) with results, goalscorers, squad, transfers, appearances and a disciplinary record of the Hajduk's players in the season. Jolicnikola (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Totić (Rijeka)

Hello, are you sure that he is not member of Rijeka anymore? Because Slovenian media reported him as being loaned from Rijeka to Krško, not a free signing? Snowflake91 (talk) 09:24, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

@Snowflake91: Hey, thanks for your question. Last winter, he only signed a six-month contract. I have access to HNS-CFF database and can verify this. It was also not a professional, but a stipend contract (stipendijski). Rijeka's newspaper (Novi List) also reported that he will be leaving the club this summer, not mentioning the loan. Effectively, his contract with Rijeka had expired and there has been no news of renewal/extension. I will keep on checking the HNS-CFF database and make changes to the page in case I am wrong.Vladovivoda (talk) 09:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:HNK Šibenik squad

Template:HNK Šibenik squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vladovivoda. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Pozdrav

Imaš i na hrvatskoj wikipediji ovaj derbi. Lijep pozdrav. Uspjeh je ključ života (talk) 15:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Ovdi je sve. Lijep pozdrav. -- Uspjeh je ključ života (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Ovdi je sve. Lijep pozdrav. -- Uspjeh je ključ života (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Milan Ristovski at Rijeka

Hello, I was just curious where did you get the information that Rijeka has now completely taken over Milan Ristovski (as so far he was only under loan there)? I cant quite find anything about it when I search. Greetings msb73505 (talk)

@Vladovivoda: do you mind telling me where you got the info as I rather need to know if it is definite/official or not as I cant find any information anywhere.

@Msb73505: Apologies for a delayed reply. This was reported in the Croatian press (Sportske Novosti) a few weeks ago. The article did not make it to their website so there is no link I can provide. The new transfers/contracts should be recorded officially by HNS-CFF soon as the transfer window started on 15 June.Vladovivoda (talk) 00:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@Vladovivoda: Thank you a lot for the reply. Good to know that :) msb73505 (talk) 17:22, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@Msb73505: No worries. I have heard that he will be loaned out somewhere in the coming season. Not sure where yet.Vladovivoda (talk) 23:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 HNK Rijeka season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artyom Timofeyev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 HNK Rijeka season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dražice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 HNK Rijeka season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Križevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vladovivoda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Croatian Third Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Križevci

List of football clubs in Croatia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Križevci

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario Ćuže

Hello Vladovivoda,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mario Ćuže for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Saff V. (talk) 07:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Nikola Totić for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikola Totić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikola Totić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 01:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 HNK Rijeka season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marko Bulat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

June 2022

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Robert Murić article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 14:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dinamo–Rijeka derby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marko Bulat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ivan Smolčić

The article Ivan Smolčić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG, significant coverage appears to be limited to publications affiliated with Smolcic's team, HNK Rijeka.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bruno Bogojević

Hello Vladovivoda, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Bruno Bogojević, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Bogojević.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)