User talk:Vivek113

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Dataupdater (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vivek113 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the only Wikipedia account which i have and i do not use any multiple account or any other ID or user ID from any other IP Address or any other system. Kindly unblock me so that i can keep contributing to Wikipedia. However, if mistakenly I am doing something wrong and which I should not be doing on Wikipedia, then kindly inform me about the same. I will stop that ASAP. I am pretty sure, this block must be due to some misunderstanding. Thanks. Vivek Chaudhary 10:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not attempt to explain the overlap in edits on Ajay Harinath Singh (producer). Yamla (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You emailed me. I've already declined your unblock review, but you are quite welcome to post a new request and have another admin review it. You'll need to discuss your overlap in editing, of course, but you did attempt to do so in your email to me. Good luck! :) --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vivek113 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I appreciate your prompt response. All i can say is I never had any socket puppet or any other account. Your issues were about the page made by some other user and you found it a Non Notable person and hence i am also blocked for making Wikipedia contributions. Anyhow that page is deleted and I should no longer be blocked.I don't mind if i am never Un-Blocked. But i have only some points to mention. If someone is trying to contribute ethically on Wikipedia he should be allowed to do so. If any mistake is there then at least give that person to correct his mistakes. Wikipedia is just a website like many others. The only thing is that Wikipedia is more legit because of the human editors. Secondly if you do not find much citations on internet does't mean that the person question is not notable enough in the society that he cannot have a Wikipedia page. Thirdly, its really not my compulsion or earning source that being on Wikipedia is my dire need. I can still contribute my knowledge through various blogs and other websites. Wikipedia is a nice platform for people like me can gain more knowledge and command over content creation by being a part of this huge community. Anyways, I don't have any issues. Thanks all admins. all the best. Vivek Chaudhary 15:38, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The evidence appears compelling, but even on the off chance that you aren't linked to that account, your edits are problematic by themselves as you're trying to promote specific digital marketing/production houses. —SpacemanSpiff 13:31, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.