User talk:Vithursan1003

November 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roja (Tamil TV series), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slashes

Please stop using slashes in cast lists as you did here. See WP:SLASH and WP:TVCAST. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you understand why, we are supposed to be communicating information clearly, in complete sentences and ideas, not using symbols and shorthand. Further, when people see this abundant misuse of slashes, they copy it to other articles, which creates thousands of articles with problematic content. If you're so inclined, try to figure out what the following means, which I found in an article:

Giaa Manek/Rubina Dilaik as Jeannie/Jenu/Chutki/Gita/Mitram/ Rajjo Ji/Jwala/Roopa/Mrs.Khanna (2012−2013)/(2013−2014)

Did Gia Manek change her name to Rubina Dilaik? Are these two actors who worked at the same time? Did they work intermittently depending on who was available? Did one replace the other? Are all those names after the "as" unique characters? The same character but with different nicknames? Are they nonuplets? What's with the parentheticals separated by slashes? Are they trying to say that Manek had this/these roles from 2012-2013, but then Dilaik took over from 2013-2014? Or does it mean that both actors worked until some point in 2013, then were pulled from the show and then came back later in 2013? Hopefully you can see the problem. And Indian entertainment articles are littered with these issues. I hope you understand why this is a problem. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:16, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interpretive content

Please don't add interpretive content like you did here. Not only does this violate WP:OR, but the phrasing you chose is also ridiculous. In a section labeled "Main", you indicate that they are "main", which is totally unnecessary. Then you indicate that they are "lead", which is synonymous with "main". And instead of lazily labeling a character as an antagonist, why don't you tell readers how the character antagonises. Ex: "Rubina is a cunning pharmaceutical executive who is willing to get ahead no matter what the cost. She dislikes Amir and is always plotting to get him fired from his job." See The Boys (2019 TV series) for an example of what character descriptions should look like.

Lastly, please don't misuse bold text the way you did. See MOS:BOLD. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]