User talk:VistaSunset

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, VistaSunset. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important message

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—Paleo Neonate – 13:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please don't make edits like this, you are forcing users through a redirect page. --Yamla (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of English Standard Version

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article English Standard Version you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aussie Article Writer -- Aussie Article Writer (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cam I just say, thank you for your efforts in the article. I’m sorry if I may seem a bit harsh in GA, that is not my intention. It’s not an easy article to write, so keep persevering! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hey, I’ve added some scholarly sources we should look into so we can improve English Standard Version. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 02:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of English Standard Version

The article English Standard Version you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:English Standard Version for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aussie Article Writer -- Aussie Article Writer (talk) 08:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:NET Pew and Worship Bible (Hardcover, Black), Oct 2019.png

Thanks for uploading File:NET Pew and Worship Bible (Hardcover, Black), Oct 2019.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 15:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ESV Reformation Study Bible (Hardcover, Crimson), Mar 2015.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ESV Reformation Study Bible (Hardcover, Crimson), Mar 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Title changes

Hello VistaSunset,

I see you've edited the lead sentence to many books/letters of the Bible recently. Can I ask where you're getting this "also known as Letter of (XYZ)" as so important as to be in the lead from? "Epistle" and "Letter" are synonymous, so I don't really see the point in adding synonyms to the lead everywhere. These are generally referred to solely by their purported writers and "Epistle of" when that's ambiguous, so I don't think this addition is an improvement - we don't need every single alternative version. Any thoughts? Would you complain if this addition was reverted? SnowFire (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SnowFire, thanks for your message. By my personal observation of the public sphere, there seems to be generally three primary ways of calling in English a book of the New Testament:

The classic, and consequently broadly known, title: e.g., the Epistle [of Paul the Apostle] to the Romans (à la King James Version)
The modern, and therefore rapidly emerging, title: e.g., the Letter of Paul to the Romans (à la English Standard Version)
The colloquial/shorthand title: e.g., "Today I read a passage from the book of Romans."

I hope this makes more sense? I know it looks long on article leads, but the problem is that the appearance of these titles throughout scholarship seem to be relatively equal (see Google Ngram). If you feel it's just a bit much in the lead (which I absolutely understand), perhaps we could use a footnote instead? Let me know what you think. VistaSunset (talk) 23:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I guess I haven't really run into the "modern and rapidly emerging title" much before - it's almost always the shorthand title from my personal experience ("James", etc.), but Wikipedia needs to disambiguate, hence using the longer "Epistle of" terminology. I see your point on the ngrams, but also note that "Epistle to the Romans" still beats out "Letter to..." by a decent amount in that ngrams. I guess I'm a bit more of a stickler about only bolding the most common synonyms in the lede. Anyway, if you feel strongly about it, I won't make any changes, but maybe something for a third opinion? Basically, the lead section is the most important section by far - it's the only part many readers ever read. So having it be really "tight" and clean is important. (On the other hand, if we're talking about really casual readers, they're the ones most likely to not know what an epistle is, so who knows.) SnowFire (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I would actually be quite happy (even prefer on second thoughts!) to tidy things up into a footnote. I can go ahead if you're happy. VistaSunset (talk) 10:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One thing I'm surprised that hasn't come up much for Biblical literature is that the "original" titles aren't mentioned - which is weird (Don Quixote mentions the Spanish title straight-up). A trick that the WP:VG project has used is to stick Japanese titles in footnotes since it's very relevant, but many readers can't read Japanese kanji - I've tried doing the same to a few articles (e.g. 2 Maccabees) since I imagine that many readers can't read Hebrew/Greek either. But it does seem important enough to mention! Anyway, just a thought for things to add to hypothetical footnotes... SnowFire (talk) 04:54, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Mark Ward (disambiguation) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:35, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Ward (theologian) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mark Ward (theologian), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crossway

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Crossway a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Crossway (disambiguation). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark Ward (theologian)

Hello, VistaSunset. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Ward (theologian), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thousand Foot Krutch - Exhale.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thousand Foot Krutch - Exhale.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American cessationists

A tag has been placed on Category:American cessationists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cessationists

Just a reminder, you should only add categories like Category:English cessationists if the claim is explicitly stated and sourced in the article - most of your recent additions do not seem to be. St Anselm (talk) 13:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I understand. I was unaware of any MOS policies regarding this. I haven't added categories to articles without confirming beyond a reasonable doubt that the category is true. VistaSunset (talk) 06:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For BLPs, the relevant policy is WP:BLPCAT. See also WP:CAT/R and WP:COPDEF: it should only be included for those people (like MacArthur) for whom cessationism is a defining part of their theology and ministry. St Anselm (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback edits on English Standard Version

I rolled back a large number of edits from an anon IP (that you're already aware of) on English Standard Version. I'm not sure what their editing objective was, but it was, frankly, a mess. I noticed that you had already reverted a significant amount of what they did, as well as possibly doing some additional edits. However, I rolled back to your last edit before all of this began, so you may (1) notice a revert message of your more recent edits, and (2) may need to reapply them (if necessary). Just wanted to let you know about it. If you have any questions for me about the rollback, just post it here. ButlerBlog (talk) 19:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, I appreciate it! VistaSunset (talk) 04:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me with adding Berean Standard Bible?

I noticed that Modern English Bible translations had "red" for the link to Berean Standard Bible, so I created a draft. See it here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:ToyoNagal/sandbox

When I tried to create the new article, it was deleted by an admin. See here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Berean_Standard_Bible 07:55, 27 September 2024 Liz talk contribs deleted page Draft:Berean Standard Bible (G13: Abandoned draft or AfC submission – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND/G13) Tag: Twinkle (thank)

It says it's an Abandoned draft even though it's a new article. Anyway, I'm new to wikipedia (I've made some minor edits over IP over a decade ago, but never created an article).

I found you by looking for people who've edited other articles for Bible translations like NJKV and ESV. Can you help me get this figured out? ToyoNagal (talk) 21:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]