User talk:Virgin United

What Gregory Maxwell said about me is true. I am in fact a Wikipedian, and I have no affiliation whatever with Virgin Unite.

Danny posted a message about "Virgin United". Someone else posted that they couldn't figure out who "Virgin United" was. Then a third person posted that "Virgin United is Virgin's charitable division." I decided to node what I didn't know: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Virgin_United&oldid=96732340

Of course, when I hit the button to create the article, I got a message which told me to create an account first. So that's what I did. Why use the username "Virgin United"? I just picked the same username as the title. Random enough.

Eventually I figured out that "Virgin United" is actually "Virgin Unite", and created another new article, Virgin Unite: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Virgin_Unite&oldid=96734143

I apologize for any distress I caused anyone.

Thanks for the explanation. You did seem to cause a bit of stir with some people who thought you were the actual organization, but no harm was done. I hope that you'll come back and contribute under a new account. - Banyan Tree 14:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virgin United (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please change my username

Decline reason:

Please simply create a new account as you have only 7 mainspace edits on this account. If you wish to assert that this account is officially that of the Virgin Unite organization, please provide verification. You can do this by enabling email in your preferences and emailing me a message from a organizational email address, i.e. examplename@virginunite.co.uk. Thank you. -- Banyan Tree 16:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.